Skip to main content

Security report for albert-schweitzer-stiftung.de

Albert Schweitzer Stiftung für unsere Mitwelt · Non-profit · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Albert Schweitzer Stiftung für unsere Mitwelt is a German non-profit organization dedicated to animal welfare, specifically targeting the abolition of factory farming. The website serves as an educational and advocacy platform, providing detailed information on animal species affected by intensive farming, current campaigns, and ways for the public to engage and support the cause. The organization maintains a strong presence on multiple social media platforms and offers newsletters to keep supporters informed. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap 5.2, Select2, and integrates third-party services such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and CleverReach for newsletters. Hosting appears to be on Amazon AWS infrastructure, ensuring reliable performance and scalability. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. However, explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response plan are not evident. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Privacy compliance is strong with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with the organization's mission. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers is mitigated by a contact form. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching albert-schweitzer-stiftung.de

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention albert-schweitzer-stiftung.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
4
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for albert-schweitzer-stiftung.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Albert Schweitzer Stiftung operates as a medium-sized non-profit focused on animal welfare and sustainability in Germany. Its market positioning is strong within the NGO sector, leveraging educational content, campaigns, and petitions to influence public opinion and policy. The business model relies on donations, advocacy, and public engagement. Key services include information dissemination, campaign management, and community mobilization. The organization benefits from a consistent brand and a comprehensive digital presence, including social media and newsletter outreach. Growth indicators include active campaigns and recent news updates. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and third-party marketing and analytics providers.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, GDPR-compliant cookie consent, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of third-party analytics and tracking is managed with user consent. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security hardening. No published security policy or incident response contact is available, which could impact incident handling readiness. There are no indications of vulnerabilities or malicious content. Compliance with GDPR is evident, but further improvements in transparency and security documentation are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide explicit contact channels for security incidents, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Albert Schweitzer Stiftung für unsere Mitwelt
Description
Wir sind eine Tierschutzorganisation für »Nutztiere«.
Key services
Animal welfare advocacy, Public education, Petitions, Campaigns against factory farming, Rankings and policy work
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.2.0, Select2 4.1.0, Cookie Consent by PrivacyPolicies.com, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel, CleverReach newsletter integration
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in for tracking
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async and defer for scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, CleverReach newsletter
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a German non-profit animal welfare organization focused on ending factory farming.
  2. Content is comprehensive, well-structured, and professionally presented.
  3. Strong social media presence across multiple platforms.
  4. Uses modern web technologies and tracking with user consent.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in provided content; contact form is primary contact method.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and responsive design framework (Bootstrap 5.2) and enhanced UI components (Select2). It integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, marketing, and cookie consent, all loaded asynchronously to optimize performance. Hosting on AWS DNS servers suggests reliable infrastructure. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple external resources. No CMS was explicitly detected, indicating a custom or less common platform. Technical debt appears low, but adding security headers and improving documentation would enhance the technical maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with albert-schweitzer-stiftung.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review albert-schweitzer-stiftung.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.