Atrium Ljungberg · Real Estate · Sweden
High risk. 16 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.
Atrium Ljungberg is a leading Swedish real estate company specializing in the development and management of vibrant urban environments across major cities such as Stockholm, Göteborg, Malmö, and Uppsala. The company focuses on creating mixed-use districts that combine office spaces, residential units, retail, and cultural offerings, emphasizing sustainability and innovation. Their market position as one of Sweden's largest publicly listed real estate firms is supported by comprehensive investor relations and a strong brand presence. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Cookiebot for consent management, HubSpot for forms and analytics, Microsoft Application Insights for telemetry, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. Hosting is provided by Microsoft Azure, ensuring robust infrastructure and performance. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, uses security tokens in forms, and manages cookie consent effectively. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, explicit security policies and incident response information are not publicly available, suggesting areas for improvement. Overall, the website presents a professional, trustworthy, and compliant digital presence aligned with the company's business objectives. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security transparency, maintaining up-to-date third-party scripts, and expanding privacy disclosures to further strengthen user trust and regulatory compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
16 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access
What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN
Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk
What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN
Port 1433 (MSSQL) is publicly accessible - MSSQL - Database server
What to do: Immediately restrict access to MSSQL using firewall or VPN
Port 1521 (Oracle) is publicly accessible - Oracle - Database server
What to do: Immediately restrict access to Oracle using firewall or VPN
Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server
What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN
Port 3389 (RDP) is publicly accessible - RDP - Remote Desktop, prime ransomware target
What to do: Immediately restrict access to RDP using firewall or VPN
Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server
What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN
Port 6379 (Redis) is publicly accessible - Redis - In-memory database
What to do: Immediately restrict access to Redis using firewall or VPN
Port 27017 (MongoDB) is publicly accessible - MongoDB - NoSQL database
What to do: Immediately restrict access to MongoDB using firewall or VPN
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
Port 135 (RPC) is publicly accessible - RPC - Windows RPC endpoint
What to do: Consider restricting access to RPC or implementing strong authentication
Port 139 (NetBIOS) is publicly accessible - NetBIOS - Windows file sharing
What to do: Consider restricting access to NetBIOS or implementing strong authentication
Port 9200 (Elasticsearch) is publicly accessible - Elasticsearch - Search engine
What to do: Consider restricting access to Elasticsearch or implementing strong authentication
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 35 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention al.se, from OffSeq Breach.
8 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for al.se.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with al.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review al.se.