Skip to main content

Security report for aktivcentr.lv

Retail · Latvia

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aktivcentrs.lv is an e-commerce platform based in Latvia specializing in retailing a broad range of products including motorcycle gear, bicycle accessories, fitness equipment, tourism goods, trailers, and children's products. The website targets consumers interested in sports, transportation, and outdoor activities, offering a structured catalog and user account features to facilitate online shopping. The platform appears to be a medium-sized regional retailer with a consistent brand presence and a focus on user-friendly navigation and product categorization. Technically, the site employs common web technologies such as jQuery and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking user interactions. While the site demonstrates good content quality and mobile optimization, it lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts a full assessment of domain legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures to improve its trustworthiness and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aktivcentr.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail sector with a focus on niche markets such as motorcycle and bicycle equipment, fitness, and tourism products. Its e-commerce model leverages a categorized product catalog and user account management to serve a Latvian customer base. The company’s competitive advantage lies in its specialized product range and structured online presence. Revenue streams are likely derived from direct online sales. The website’s partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related or subsidiary domains were identified. Growth indicators such as user engagement tools and analytics are present, but the lack of visible privacy and security policies may impact customer confidence. Strategic observations suggest the company should enhance transparency and security to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website shows a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS usage assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the provided data. The absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security indicates potential vulnerabilities to common web attacks. The login form collects user credentials but lacks visible advanced security measures. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, and no security certifications are displayed. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is unclear due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The site would benefit from a comprehensive security audit, implementation of security headers, and clear privacy documentation to improve its security posture and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS site-wide with valid SSL certificates.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Online retail platform offering a wide range of products including motorcycle gear, bicycle accessories, fitness equipment, tourism goods, trailers, and children's products.
Key services
Online product catalog, User account management, Shopping cart and checkout, Customer support via contact form and email
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage assumed (not explicitly confirmed)
  • Secure login form with email and password fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian e-commerce platform specializing in motorcycle, bicycle, fitness, tourism, and related products.
  2. Clear contact information including phone numbers and company email is provided in the header.
  3. Site uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and analytics.
  4. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service pages were detected in the provided HTML content.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error, limiting domain trust assessment.
  6. No explicit security headers detected; HTTPS usage assumed but not confirmed from data.
  7. Site navigation and product categorization are well structured and user-friendly.
  8. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The HTML structure is well-organized with clear navigation and product categorization, supporting a good user experience and mobile responsiveness. However, no modern frameworks or CMS platforms were explicitly detected. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization and modern technology adoption. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal but present. The lack of visible security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Modernization opportunities include adopting security best practices, enhancing accessibility, and improving privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aktivcentr.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aktivcentr.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.