Skip to main content

Security report for akb-stiftung.de

AKB Stiftung · Non-profit · Germany

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The AKB Stiftung website represents a small, regional non-profit foundation with a family heritage focus. The site content is minimal but clearly communicates the foundation's regional engagement and mission. The business model is typical for a non-profit foundation, relying on regional initiatives and likely donations or grants. The market position is niche and localized, with no evident commercial activities or services offered online. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme and several plugins including Slider Revolution and MediaElement.js. The site is served over HTTPS, indicating a basic level of security. However, the technical implementation is basic with limited mobile optimization and no advanced SEO or accessibility features detected. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. From a security perspective, the site has HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and does not disclose any security or incident response policies. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of security best practices and policies suggests room for improvement. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the website is safe and appropriate for a general audience, with no adult or questionable content. The lack of contact information and compliance documentation reduces trust and business credibility. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and contact transparency are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching akb-stiftung.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
40
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AKB Stiftung operates as a small non-profit foundation focused on regional engagement in Germany. Its competitive advantage lies in its family heritage and localized focus. The business model is non-commercial, likely funded by private or family resources. The target audience includes regional beneficiaries and stakeholders interested in the foundation's mission. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The website serves primarily as an informational portal rather than a transactional platform. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the site content.

Security posture

The security posture of the AKB Stiftung website is basic. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR requirements. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency and preparedness. The site does not use analytics or tracking scripts, minimizing data exposure risks. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing standard security headers, privacy documentation, and incident response contacts to improve its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance security posture.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to improve transparency.
  4. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience.
  5. Include clear contact information to increase business credibility and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AKB Stiftung
Description
Die AKB Stiftung ist eine junge Stiftung mit einem alten Familienhintergrund, die sich im Sinne des Stifters vorwiegend regional engagiert. Auf ihren Kerngebieten ist sie überwiegend in Eigeninitative unterwegs.
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Slider Revolution, MediaElement.js, 3D Flipbook DFlip Lite, Enfold Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Enfold theme and Slider Revolution plugin.
  2. Content is minimal and focused on a regional non-profit foundation.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links explicitly found.
  5. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No forms present on the homepage content.
  8. No explicit business registration or certification information found.
  9. Logo image is present and prominently displayed.
  10. Mobile optimization is basic; some elements hidden on small screens.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Enfold theme and several plugins including Slider Revolution and MediaElement.js. The site uses jQuery and includes a 3D flipbook plugin. The technical stack is modern but basic, with no advanced frameworks detected. Performance is moderate with some inline styles and scripts for above-the-fold content. Mobile optimization is basic with some elements hidden on smaller screens. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data for business or organization. No analytics or tracking tools are implemented, indicating minimal data collection. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could be improved with enhanced SEO, accessibility, and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with akb-stiftung.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review akb-stiftung.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.