Skip to main content

Security report for aitechly.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AITechly is a newly registered technology-focused website launched in 2023, offering a dashboard with user sign-in functionality. The site is built using React and Material-UI, indicating a modern front-end technology stack. However, the website content is minimal, primarily consisting of a sign-in form without additional business descriptions, policies, or contact information. The domain registration is transparent and consistent with a new business, registered via NameCheap without privacy protection. The lack of detailed business information and policies limits the site's trustworthiness and compliance posture. From a technical perspective, the website uses a modern JavaScript framework (React) and Material-UI for UI components, but lacks SEO optimization, accessibility features, and performance enhancements. No CMS or advanced hosting details are evident. Security posture is basic, with no detected security headers or advanced protections, and no visible HTTPS confirmation in the provided data. The sign-in form collects email and password but lacks visible anti-CSRF tokens or other security measures. Security evaluation reveals missing security headers and absence of privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The site does not use tracking or advertising technologies, which reduces privacy concerns but also limits marketing insights. Overall, the site scores moderately low on content quality, technical implementation, and privacy compliance, with business credibility also limited by lack of contact and policy information. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS, adding comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, deploying security headers, improving accessibility and SEO, and providing clear business contact and security incident response information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aitechly.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AITechly appears to be a small technology entity focused on providing a user dashboard with sign-in capabilities. The business model and market positioning are unclear due to minimal content and lack of descriptive information. The target audience likely includes users requiring authenticated access to services or data. The company was founded in 2023, consistent with the domain registration date. No parent company or subsidiaries are identified. The absence of marketing tools, analytics, or advertising suggests a limited or early-stage online presence. No partnerships or related domains are evident. Growth indicators and revenue streams cannot be determined from the available data.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is basic and lacks several best practices. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security increases risk exposure. No visible HTTPS confirmation in the data is a concern, though the domain likely supports HTTPS. The sign-in form collects sensitive user credentials but lacks visible anti-CSRF protections or input validation indicators. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are missing, reducing readiness for security events. Overall, the site requires significant improvements to meet standard security and compliance expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce Strict-Transport-Security header.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Deploy essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Introduce vulnerability disclosure and incident response information accessible to users.
  5. Enhance form security by adding anti-CSRF tokens and input validation mechanisms.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website appears to be a technology-related platform offering a dashboard with sign-in functionality. No explicit business description is provided in the content.
Key services
User authentication/sign-in
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
React, Material-UI, JavaScript
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Form uses HTTPS implied by domain (not explicitly confirmed)
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a basic React app with a sign-in form.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details provided.
  4. No security headers or advanced security features detected.
  5. Domain is newly registered and not privacy protected.
  6. No external marketing or analytics tools detected.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts found.
  8. Content is minimal and focused on user login functionality.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React and Material-UI, indicating a modern front-end framework and component library. The HTML structure is valid but minimal, with no SEO meta tags beyond a basic description. No JSON-LD or Open Graph metadata is present. The site lacks analytics, tracking, or advertising scripts, which simplifies privacy but limits marketing insights. Hosting appears to be managed via NameCheap DNS servers, but no explicit hosting provider or CMS is detected. Performance is moderate with deferred JavaScript loading. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no ARIA attributes or advanced accessibility features detected. The site would benefit from SEO improvements, accessibility enhancements, and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aitechly.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aitechly.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.