Skip to main content

Security report for aitaneestit.ee

Aitan Eestit MTÜ · Non-profit · Estonia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aitan Eestit MTÜ is a small Estonian non-profit organization founded in 2020, focused on charitable activities that connect donors with those in need. The organization primarily engages young people to collect donations and spread their message, aiming to improve social welfare in Estonia. The website reflects this mission with clear calls to action for donations and partnership, supported by a modern WordPress infrastructure using Elementor and GiveWP plugins. The site is multilingual, supporting Estonian, English, and Russian languages, enhancing accessibility for diverse audiences. Technically, the website is built on a robust WordPress platform with SEO optimization via Yoast and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure data transmission. However, it lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which could be improved to enhance security posture. The donation forms collect essential contact information such as email and phone numbers, but no explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating a gap in GDPR compliance. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates basic best practices like HTTPS and nonce tokens in forms but misses critical elements like security headers and documented incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the organization's founding date and domain usage, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening. Strategically, the organization should prioritize implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, enable DNSSEC, and add security headers to improve trust and compliance. Enhancing transparency around data protection and incident response will further strengthen their security culture and stakeholder confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aitaneestit.ee

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
74
Security headers
80
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Aitan Eestit MTÜ operates in the non-profit sector within Estonia, targeting socially conscious individuals and donors interested in supporting multiple charitable causes. Their business model relies on donations facilitated through an online platform, leveraging partnerships and youth engagement for outreach. The organization maintains a moderate market position as a local charity with a clear mission to create long-term social impact. Their digital presence is supported by modern web technologies and social media channels, indicating a growing ecosystem. Revenue streams are primarily from recurring and one-time donations collected via the website. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed but includes representatives selectable during donation. Growth indicators include multilingual support and active social media engagement. Strategic observations suggest a focus on expanding donor base and improving digital trust through enhanced compliance and security measures.

Security posture

The website exhibits a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of nonce tokens in forms indicates awareness of CSRF protection. There is no evidence of a formal incident response plan or vulnerability disclosure policy, which are important for compliance with GDPR and NIS2 directives. Data protection practices are partially implemented but lack transparency due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The security culture appears nascent, with room for improvement in documentation and technical controls. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small non-profit but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and risk management standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Develop and disclose an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aitan Eestit MTÜ
Description
Aitan Eestit mõte on viia kokku neid, kellel on midagi anda nendega, kes midagi vajavad. Annetuste kogumisega tegelevad enamasti noored – nemad suudavad anda oma aega ja julgust, et seda sõnumit levitada.
Key services
Donation collection, Social aid facilitation, Partner collaboration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, WooCommerce, GiveWP plugin, Yoast SEO, Google Fonts, Google Analytics
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Elementor page builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce tokens in forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a charity organization focused on social aid in Estonia
  2. Content is in Estonian with language alternates for English and Russian
  3. Donation forms collect email, phone, amount, and representative selection
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policy found
  5. Uses modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram
  7. No visible security headers detected
  8. DNSSEC not enabled
  9. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities, supplemented by GiveWP for donation management. It uses Google Fonts and Google Analytics for typography and visitor tracking respectively. The hosting and domain registration are managed by Zone Media OÜ, a known Estonian registrar and hosting provider. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO is well addressed via Yoast SEO plugin. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA landmarks and skip links present but could be improved. The technical stack is modern but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning to reduce load times and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aitaneestit.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aitaneestit.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.