Skip to main content

Security report for aisico.com

Aisico · Transportation · Italy

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AISICO is an established Italian company specializing in road safety and crash test services, boasting over 30 years of experience. The company operates a unique European testing center dedicated to crash tests, supported by a skilled team and advanced laboratories. Their market position is strong within the transportation safety sector, offering a broad range of services including certification, infrastructure testing, and training. The website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence, supporting their leadership claims with detailed service descriptions and accreditations. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and includes GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies managed by Iubenda. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers are missing and no explicit incident response or security policy pages were found. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, potentially impacting trust and legitimacy perceptions. Overall, AISICO presents as a credible and professional organization with room for improvement in domain transparency and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aisico.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AISICO targets organizations and businesses involved in road safety, infrastructure, and vehicle testing. Their competitive advantage lies in being the only European lab capable of performing all crash test types, supported by extensive accreditations and certifications. The business model focuses on service delivery including testing, certification, research, and training. Growth indicators include a steady annual growth rate and a medium-sized workforce. The company maintains an active social media presence and uses professional marketing and analytics tools. Strategic observations suggest AISICO could benefit from enhancing domain registration transparency and expanding incident response communications to strengthen trust further.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy indicates a gap in security transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy policies and consent banners, but additional security best practices and incident response details would improve the security culture and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Verify and publish domain registration details to improve legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  3. Develop and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to demonstrate security readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance form security by ensuring anti-CSRF tokens and input validation are in place.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AISICO
Registration number
REA 1216077
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aisico
Description
AISICO - Associazione italiana per la sicurezza della circolazione da oltre 30 anni è leader nel campo della sicurezza stradale e nelle prove di crash test. Siamo l'unico laboratorio in Europa che può eseguire tutte le prove di CrashTest.
Key services
Crash Test, Prove FIA, Materiali, Segnaletica, Acustica, Prove statiche e dinamiche, Infrastrutture, Rilevi ad Alto Rendimento, Simulazioni numeriche, Certificazione CE
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Swiper.js, Iubenda cookie solution, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner with GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight
Marketing tools
Iubenda cookie consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong focus on road safety, crash testing, and related services
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies implemented via Iubenda
  4. Multiple contact points with verified company emails and phone numbers
  5. No evidence of security headers in HTML but HTTPS is enabled
  6. No WHOIS data available, raising domain legitimacy concerns
  7. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and WordPress CMS
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter (X), and YouTube
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements, and integrates Iubenda for privacy and cookie management. Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight are used for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from improved security configurations and hosting transparency. No hosting provider information was detected from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience aligned with the company's business goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aisico.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aisico.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.