Skip to main content

Security report for airport-pardubice.cz

Pardubice Airport · Transportation · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Pardubice Airport operates as a regional transportation hub in the Czech Republic, providing passenger flight services and collaborating with multiple travel agencies and airlines to offer holiday destinations. The website reflects a professional and user-friendly digital presence built on WordPress with Elementor, featuring flight schedules, partner offers, and airport services. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, supporting moderate user tracking and marketing efforts. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though the absence of WHOIS data and some security headers suggests room for improvement. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive cookie policy and GDPR consent. Overall, the airport's digital presence supports its business model effectively but would benefit from enhanced transparency in domain registration and additional security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching airport-pardubice.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The airport maintains strong partnerships with leading travel agencies like Fischer, Exim Tours, TUI, and airlines such as Ryanair and Wizz Air, positioning itself as a key regional player in the transportation and tourism sector. Its business model focuses on passenger services, B2B offerings, and facilitating holiday travel through partner agencies. The website's content and linked domains indicate a well-established ecosystem supporting customer engagement and service delivery. Growth indicators include new destinations and expanded flight schedules. However, the lack of explicit contact information and corporate details on the website may limit direct customer trust and engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security maturity with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, and missing incident response or security policy pages, indicate gaps in comprehensive security governance. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration transparency, which could impact trustworthiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be strengthened by implementing additional headers, publishing security policies, and ensuring domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to improve domain registration trust and legitimacy.
  4. Enhance contact information availability, including verified company emails and phone numbers, to improve customer trust and support.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins, themes, and scripts to minimize vulnerabilities and maintain compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pardubice Airport
Description
Pardubice Airport is a transportation hub offering passenger flights, airport services, and partnerships with travel agencies for holiday destinations. It serves as a regional airport in the Czech Republic providing scheduled and charter flights.
Key services
Passenger flights, Flight schedule information, Transport and parking, Airport services, B2B services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Google Fonts, Font Awesome, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to airport and travel services.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which limits domain legitimacy verification.
  5. Multiple partner travel agencies and airlines are linked and promoted.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found on the site.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
  9. Website uses WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder.
  10. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder, leveraging modern front-end libraries such as jQuery, Swiper.js, and Font Awesome for UI components and animations. Google Fonts are used for typography, and Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility considerations, though these could be improved. Performance is moderate, with some CSS and JS assets optimized via caching and autoptimize plugins. The technical stack is standard for a regional airport website, providing a balance between functionality and maintainability. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and improve SEO and accessibility features further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with airport-pardubice.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review airport-pardubice.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.