Skip to main content

Security report for airplus.com

AirPlus · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AirPlus operates as a global enterprise specializing in corporate travel payment and expense management solutions. The company targets business travelers and corporate clients worldwide, offering localized website versions for multiple countries and languages. The business model focuses on B2B services within the transportation sector, positioning AirPlus as an established player in the corporate travel payment industry. Technically, the website is hosted on an Apache server with Akamai CDN support, utilizing JavaScript and Bootstrap frameworks for frontend presentation. While the site offers multilingual support and country-specific content, performance metrics are not provided, and the site shows basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. The technical stack is modern but lacks advanced CMS or platform indicators. From a security perspective, the website lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not enable any TLS protocols, which is a critical vulnerability. Although several security headers are present, some important protections like X-XSS-Protection are disabled, and HSTS is not fully configured. The site uses multiple external tracking and advertising services, leading to extensive user tracking without visible privacy or cookie policies, indicating poor privacy compliance. Overall, the website demonstrates moderate business credibility but suffers from significant security and privacy shortcomings. Strategic improvements in SSL/TLS configuration, privacy policy implementation, and security header enhancements are essential to reduce risk and improve trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching airplus.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention airplus.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
777
Employees
2
Customers
681
Third parties
94
Weak passwords
11%

Latest record dated 2025-11-08 · 14 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for airplus.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –sso.service.airplus.com2025-11-08
  • –sso.k8sdev.airplus.com2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AirPlus holds a strong market position in the corporate travel payment sector, serving a global clientele with localized services. The company leverages partnerships with major advertising and analytics platforms to support marketing and user engagement. The business model is focused on providing travel payment solutions and expense management tools to enterprises, which likely generates revenue through service fees and transaction processing. The website's multilingual and multi-regional approach indicates a broad target market and a mature partnership ecosystem. However, the lack of visible contact information and trust signals such as certifications or testimonials may limit user confidence and conversion rates.

Security posture

The current security posture of AirPlus's website is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, exposing users to potential data interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. While some security headers like Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security are implemented, critical protections such as X-XSS-Protection are disabled, and HSTS is not fully enforced. The lack of privacy and cookie policies further exposes the company to compliance risks under GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. The extensive use of third-party tracking services without clear consent mechanisms raises privacy concerns and potential regulatory exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user communications.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated protocols to enhance security.
  3. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Enable and properly configure security headers including X-XSS-Protection and full HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload.
  5. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and security culture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an Apache server with Akamai CDN integration, indicating a robust hosting environment. The frontend uses JavaScript and Bootstrap for responsive design, though mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. Performance data is unavailable, but the lack of resource counts and page size metrics suggests incomplete measurement. The DNS configuration includes valid MX and SPF records, supporting reliable email delivery. However, the SSL/TLS configuration is critically deficient, with no valid certificate and no enabled TLS protocols, which is a major technical risk. The site uses multiple external analytics and advertising scripts, increasing complexity and potential privacy risks. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced platform usage, indicating a possibly custom or static site architecture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with airplus.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review airplus.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.