Skip to main content

Security report for airbalticrigaopen.lv

airBaltic Riga Open · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The airBaltic Riga Open website represents a well-organized sports event focused on disc golf, held annually in Riga, Latvia. The event targets disc golf players, sports enthusiasts, and the local community, offering a world-level competition alongside entertainment and activities. The site demonstrates a consistent brand presence with multiple reputable sponsors and social media engagement, positioning itself as a leading disc golf event in Latvia. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, with Material UI for styling. It is hosted likely on Render.com and optimized for mobile devices, providing a fast and user-friendly experience. However, there is a lack of visible security headers and privacy-related policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers and does not provide a vulnerability disclosure or incident response information. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits the ability to fully assess domain legitimacy, though the website content and external links suggest a legitimate operation. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparency in domain registration details to improve trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching airbalticrigaopen.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The airBaltic Riga Open operates as an event organizer in the sports and transportation sectors, leveraging sponsorships from well-known companies such as airBaltic and BWT. Its business model centers on hosting a major disc golf competition with a strong community and international player focus. The event's market position is solid within Latvia, supported by partnerships with recognized organizations like PDGA and DiscGolfMetrix. Revenue streams likely include player entry fees, sponsorships, and possibly merchandising or hospitality services. The target customer segments include amateur and professional disc golf players, local residents, and tourists attending the event. Growth indicators include recurring annual events and expanding sponsorships. The partnership ecosystem is diverse, spanning transportation, hospitality, and sports equipment sectors.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response mechanisms are present, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerable libraries, but the lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in policy transparency and technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and improve user trust.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Ensure all forms and user inputs have proper validation and CSRF protections to prevent injection attacks.
  5. Increase transparency by providing WHOIS domain registration details or using a registrar that allows public access.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
airBaltic Riga Open
Description
Annual disc golf competition and event held in Riga, Latvia, featuring world-level disc golf competition, entertainment, contests, and activities for all ages.
Key services
Disc golf competition, Event hosting, Sponsorship opportunities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS, HTML
Frameworks
Next.js, Material UI
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (inferred from URL)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-structured event site for airBaltic Riga Open disc golf competition.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with email and phone number.
  4. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  6. Site uses modern web technologies and is mobile optimized.
  7. Multiple reputable sponsors and partners linked.
  8. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework with Material UI components, indicating a contemporary and maintainable codebase. Hosting appears to be on Render.com, inferred from asset URLs. The site is mobile optimized and loads efficiently, with preloading of fonts and images to improve performance. SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags and structured navigation. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced for better compliance with standards. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site approach. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking scripts, which may limit marketing insights but improves privacy. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of documented security policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with airbalticrigaopen.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review airbalticrigaopen.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.