Skip to main content

Security report for aipassivhaus.com

Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website aipassivhaus.com is a Japanese language niche affiliate marketing site focused on skincare products for people in their 40s. It provides curated product rankings, detailed descriptions, and lifestyle advice related to facial cleansing and skincare. The business model relies on affiliate links to monetize product recommendations. The site appears small-scale and was established in 2020, with a consistent domain registration and hosting environment in Japan. Technically, the site is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without any detected CMS or advanced frameworks. It uses external affiliate networks and tracking services such as Research Artisan Pro. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO but lacks advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no critical technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site lacks important security headers and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which impacts compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No contact information or incident response details are provided, limiting transparency and trust. The domain registration is legitimate and consistent with the website's purpose and hosting. Overall, the website is functional and serves its niche audience but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security posture, and transparency to enhance trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aipassivhaus.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site targets a specific demographic (people in their 40s) interested in skincare, leveraging affiliate marketing as its primary revenue stream. It competes in the retail skincare niche with a focus on product rankings and educational content. The lack of direct company information or contact details suggests a small or individual operator rather than a large enterprise. The extensive use of affiliate links indicates reliance on third-party partnerships for monetization. The site’s market position is that of a niche content provider with moderate branding consistency and good content relevance for its audience.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with no HTTPS status explicitly confirmed but assumed given modern web standards. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating poor compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the ability to report or respond to security issues. The site uses third-party tracking and affiliate scripts, which may introduce privacy risks without user consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is properly configured and enforced site-wide.
  4. Provide clear contact information including a contact form or email for user and security inquiries.
  5. Review third-party scripts for privacy impact and implement user consent mechanisms for tracking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides curated recommendations and rankings for facial cleansing products targeted at people in their 40s, focusing on skincare advice, product features, and lifestyle tips for maintaining healthy skin.
Key services
Skincare product reviews, Affiliate links to purchase recommended products, Educational content on facial cleansing and skincare
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Research Artisan Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
A8.net, AFI-b.com
Tracking pixels
Research Artisan Pro
Marketing tools
Affiliate marketing links
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Japanese language skincare affiliate site targeting people in their 40s.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links present.
  4. Uses affiliate marketing with multiple external affiliate links.
  5. No security headers or advanced security features detected.
  6. No CMS or advanced frameworks detected; simple static HTML/CSS/JS site.
  7. Tracking via Research Artisan Pro analytics is present.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; content fully accessible.
  9. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the website.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a static HTML/CSS/JS site without a detected CMS or advanced frameworks. It uses affiliate marketing networks (A8.net, AFI-b.com) and Research Artisan Pro for analytics. Hosting is via a Japanese registrar and DNS provider (GMO Internet Group and xserver.jp). The site has basic mobile optimization and SEO but lacks advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no detected broken elements. The site could benefit from modernization including improved security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aipassivhaus.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aipassivhaus.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.