Skip to main content

Security report for aip.swiss

Jugendsozialwerk Blaues Kreuz BL · Non-profit · Switzerland

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AIP plus is a Swiss non-profit organization operating since 1996, focused on providing employment opportunities and integration support for job seekers, particularly those assigned by social insurance and employment agencies. The organization collaborates with local businesses to offer training and internships, aiming to facilitate entry into the first labor market. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and provides clear contact information and partner links, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Tag Manager, with a cookie consent mechanism ensuring privacy compliance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, though security headers are missing and could be improved. WHOIS data is privacy protected, typical for Swiss domains, but the website's content and certifications strongly support legitimacy. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, privacy compliance, and business credibility, making it a trustworthy and professional platform.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aip.swiss

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention aip.swiss, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for aip.swiss right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a solid position in the social non-profit sector in Switzerland, focusing on youth and employment integration. Its business model revolves around social services funded likely by public and private donations, supported by certifications such as ZEWO and SQS. The target audience includes job seekers, employers, and social agencies. The website's ecosystem includes multiple partner domains under the Jugendsozialwerk umbrella, indicating a broad network. The presence of detailed program descriptions and contact points suggests a transparent and service-oriented approach. Growth indicators include active news updates and community engagement. The partnership ecosystem is strong, with multiple related domains linked in navigation and footer areas.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics is privacy-aware with IP anonymization. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but could benefit from additional hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with standards and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and contact information to improve SEO and data interoperability.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Jugendsozialwerk Blaues Kreuz BL
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Jugendsozialwerk Blaues Kreuz BL
Description
AIP plus is a non-profit organization focused on providing employment opportunities and training for job seekers, especially those assigned by cantonal IV offices and regional employment centers (RAV). It supports professional integration into the first labor market and collaborates with companies to offer training and internships.
Key services
Job placement, Training and coaching, Work integration programs, Partnerships with employers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Bootstrap, FlexSlider, cookieconsent.js, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
webIQ 5.0 web application framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with explicit consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in German language.
  3. Strong focus on social employment integration and community support.
  4. Clear contact information with company emails and phone numbers.
  5. Cookie consent implemented with clear messaging in German.
  6. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  7. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks.
  8. No forms collecting personal data directly on the homepage.
  9. WHOIS data is privacy protected with no public registrant info.
  10. Multiple external links to partner and related non-profit sites.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a combination of HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and popular libraries such as jQuery and Bootstrap, supported by the webIQ 5.0 framework. It uses FlexSlider for interactive content and cookieconsent.js for privacy management. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and content relevance. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical debt observed. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or framework-based solution. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aip.swiss. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aip.swiss.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.