Skip to main content

Security report for ain.cz

Asociace inspektorů nemovitostí · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.ain.cz represents the Asociace inspektorů nemovitostí (AIN), a Czech association of property inspectors. It serves as a professional platform for experts conducting property inspections and members who maintain and expand their expertise in technical inspections and the real estate sales process. The site positions itself as a specialized association within the Czech real estate sector, targeting professionals involved in property inspection and sales. The business model is membership-based, focusing on knowledge sharing and professional development. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, enhanced with SEO and GDPR compliance plugins, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The website is accessible without any WAF or security challenges, and it features a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting basic privacy compliance. However, the absence of a visible privacy policy and contact information limits full compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and incident response information. Overall, the site appears professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ain.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AIN operates as a niche professional association within the Czech Republic's real estate inspection market. Its competitive advantage lies in its focused expertise and community of inspectors, providing education and awareness on property inspections and sales processes. Revenue likely derives from membership fees and professional services. The target customers are property inspectors and related professionals seeking certification and knowledge enhancement. The website's partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related or subsidiary domains were identified. Growth indicators are not visible on the site. Strategic observations suggest the association could improve market positioning by enhancing online transparency and expanding digital engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and a GDPR cookie consent plugin is active, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of visible security headers, absence of a security policy or incident response contacts, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms highlight gaps in security maturity. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration transparency, which could impact trust. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries from the provided content. To improve, the organization should implement comprehensive security headers, publish security and incident response policies, and ensure domain registration information is transparent and up to date.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance transparency and GDPR compliance.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to improve security posture.
  3. Publish contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting to improve trust and incident response readiness.
  4. Verify and update domain WHOIS information to ensure registration transparency and legitimacy.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Asociace inspektorů nemovitostí
Description
Asociace inspektorů nemovitostí (AIN) sdružuje odborníky, kteří inspekce nemovitosti vykonávají – tedy inspektory nemovitostí nebo členy, kteří pomocí AIN udržují a rozšiřují své odborné znalosti, a to jak v oboru technických inspekcí, tak všeobecného podvědomí se zaměřením na kompletní problematiku procesu prodeje nemovitostí.
Key services
property inspections, professional knowledge sharing, technical inspections, education and awareness in real estate sales process
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, Complianz GDPR plugin, jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Use of GDPR cookie consent plugin

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenge
  2. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment
  3. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and common SEO and GDPR plugins
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage content
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is present and active
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in visible content
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. Content is professional and focused on real estate inspection association in Czech Republic
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and widely used CMS platform, WordPress, with the Divi theme providing a flexible and visually appealing design. SEO is enhanced via the Yoast SEO plugin, and GDPR compliance is supported by the Complianz plugin. The site loads external resources such as Google Fonts and uses jQuery for scripting. Performance is moderate, with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. There is room for improvement in technical SEO and accessibility compliance. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected, but regular updates and security patching are recommended to maintain operational integrity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ain.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ain.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.