Skip to main content

Security report for ahmadteabaltic.com

LATVOKO Ltd. · Retail · Denmark

High risk. 13 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 4 other checks.

Security score

35/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ahmad Tea Baltic represents the British tea brand Ahmad Tea in the Baltic States, offering a wide range of tea products including black, green, herbal, and gift sets. The company positions itself as a quality-focused distributor with a history dating back to 1998. The website serves as an informational and representative platform with links to an official online shop. Technically, the site uses a variety of established JavaScript libraries and frameworks such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Slider Revolution, hosted by Inova Group SIA. While the site is functional and professionally designed, it lacks some modern security and privacy features such as security headers, cookie consent mechanisms, and published privacy policies. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, supporting the business claims. Overall, the site is trustworthy but could improve in privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

13 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ahmadteabaltic.com

This scan found 31 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
40
DNS health
55
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
35

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail sector, focusing on tea distribution in the Baltic region. It leverages partnerships with official online shops and maintains a strong social media presence to engage customers. The business model centers on regional representation and product distribution rather than direct e-commerce. Certifications and awards displayed on the site enhance brand credibility. The company appears small in size but well-established with a niche market focus. Growth opportunities could include enhanced digital marketing and improved compliance with privacy regulations.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS for secure communication but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder security incident management. The site uses third-party analytics and tracking scripts without visible consent mechanisms, raising privacy concerns. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience across devices.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to avoid vulnerabilities and ensure privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LATVOKO Ltd.
Description
Representative in the Baltic States of Ahmad Tea, a British brand offering a wide assortment of teas including black, green, herbal, fruit infusions, and exclusive gift sets. The company emphasizes quality and tradition since 1998.
Key services
Tea product distribution, Information about Ahmad Tea products, Online ordering via partner shop
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.1.3, Bootstrap 3.3.2, Slider Revolution, jQuery UI 1.10.3, PrettyPhoto, Gritter, Google Fonts, Facebook SDK, Google Analytics, CarouFredSel, Underscore.js, Bootstrap Tour
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS URLs in scripts and resources
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Social media presence is strong with multiple official accounts linked.
  4. Certifications and awards are prominently displayed, enhancing trust.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. No forms detected that collect user data on the homepage.
  7. Use of multiple third-party scripts and libraries for UI and analytics.
  8. No security headers detected, which is a security improvement area.
  9. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and domain is actively maintained.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom or unknown CMS platform using a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap, and various UI and animation libraries. It integrates social media SDKs and Google Analytics for tracking. Hosting is provided by Inova Group SIA. Performance is moderate with some room for improvement in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site lacks modern security headers and privacy compliance features, which are critical for trust and regulatory adherence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ahmadteabaltic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ahmadteabaltic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.