Skip to main content

Security report for aha.li

aha · Non-profit · Liechtenstein

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

aha is a non-profit organization focused on providing tips, information, and support services for young people in Liechtenstein. The website serves as a comprehensive portal offering news, events, workshops, youth participation opportunities, and project coaching. It targets youth and youth workers, positioning itself as a key regional player in youth information and engagement. The organization maintains a consistent brand presence and leverages social media channels to extend its reach. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and uses various plugins for SEO, analytics, and live chat. The site is mobile optimized and employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration. While performance is moderate, the site benefits from structured metadata and SEO best practices, enhancing discoverability. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks some security headers and explicit security or incident response policies. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, with a strong focus on youth services. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency would enhance its posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aha.li

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention aha.li, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for aha.li right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

aha operates in the non-profit sector, focusing on youth information and engagement within Liechtenstein. Its business model revolves around providing free educational content, event information, and support services to young people. The organization leverages partnerships with regional and European youth networks, such as Eurodesk and aha Vorarlberg, to expand its offerings. Revenue streams are likely grant-based or public funding, typical for non-profits. The website's content and structure indicate a mature digital presence with clear navigation and relevant services. Growth indicators include active social media channels and event-driven content updates. The partnership ecosystem supports its mission and regional influence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. The absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No direct vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of explicit security policies and incident response information suggests limited transparency in security governance. GDPR compliance is partially met with a privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but could benefit from enhanced security controls and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and user trust.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
aha
Description
aha provides tips and information for young people including news on projects, youth information, events, youth participation, Erasmus+ JUGEND IN AKTION, and contact details.
Key services
Youth information, Workshops, Training, Project coaching, Youth participation, Events, Job alerts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Plausible Analytics, Brevo Conversations (live chat), Google Translate
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress environment)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Metricool
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics, Metricool
Marketing tools
Brevo Conversations (live chat), Google Translate, GTranslate plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-structured youth information portal for Liechtenstein
  2. Content is primarily in German with multi-language support via Google Translate
  3. No direct email or phone contact found on main page, contact primarily via forms
  4. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR relevance
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It integrates several third-party services including Plausible Analytics for privacy-focused tracking, Brevo Conversations for live chat support, and Google Translate for multilingual support. The site uses Font Awesome for icons and Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate, with multiple external resources loaded from CDNs. The site is mobile optimized with responsive navigation and layout adjustments. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with enhanced ARIA roles and semantic HTML. SEO is well addressed with Yoast SEO plugin and structured JSON-LD data. Technical risks include reliance on multiple external scripts and absence of advanced security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aha.li. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aha.li.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.