Skip to main content

Security report for agrostav-pce.cz

Agrostav Pardubice a.s. · Real Estate · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Agrostav Pardubice a.s. is a well-established general contractor in the construction sector in the Czech Republic, with a history dating back to 1971. The company operates as part of the B.A.S. – CZ group, providing a range of construction services including engineering, building, water management, and concrete production. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting construction clients and partners in the region. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, with standard web technologies and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible privacy or cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Contact information is clearly provided, supporting business credibility. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and trustworthy but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agrostav-pce.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a significant position in the regional construction market, supported by its long history and affiliation with the B.A.S. – CZ group. Its business model focuses on general contracting and specialized construction services, serving a diverse client base in infrastructure and building projects. The website content and references indicate a stable business with a focus on quality and experience. The lack of visible analytics or tracking suggests a privacy-conscious or minimalistic digital marketing approach. Partnerships with design studios and subsidiaries indicate a structured corporate ecosystem.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others that help mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible incident response or security policy information, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. No forms or input fields are present on the homepage, reducing immediate attack surface, but the absence of cookie consent and privacy policies indicates potential GDPR compliance issues. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better headers, policies, and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add a cookie consent mechanism to inform and obtain user consent for tracking and cookies.
  3. Configure and deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish a security policy or incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Consider adding analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to improve marketing insights while maintaining compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Agrostav Pardubice a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Agrostav Pardubice a.s.
Description
Agrostav Pardubice a.s. is a general contractor in construction with a tradition since 1971. It operates in engineering constructions, building constructions, water management constructions, and construction services. It is part of the B.A.S. – CZ group, which includes B.A.S. – CZ s.r.o. and B.A.S. – CONCRETE s.r.o., making it a significant market player in the Czech Republic.
Key services
Inženýrské stavby, Pozemní stavby, Vodohospodářské stavby, Služby pro stavebnictví, Betonárna Holice
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Divi Builder
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page or footer.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented in the footer with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No visible forms on the homepage; contact likely via email or phone.
  5. No social media links detected in the provided content.
  6. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and standard plugins.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  8. No security headers detected in the HTML content; SSL is present and valid.
  9. Content is professional, construction industry focused, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with the Divi theme, a popular and flexible platform for business websites. The technology stack includes jQuery and Google Fonts, which are standard but somewhat dated technologies. The site is mobile optimized and has good navigation clarity. Hosting appears to be with Active24, a known Czech provider, consistent with the domain registrar. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML content. There is room for modernization by adopting newer JavaScript frameworks or optimizing resource loading. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and semantic HTML improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agrostav-pce.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agrostav-pce.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.