Skip to main content

Security report for agro21.cz

AGRO 21 s.r.o. · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AGRO 21 s.r.o. is a Czech company specializing in the organization of agricultural land purchases directly for farmers, avoiding resale to maximize prices for sellers. The company positions itself as a trusted intermediary with over 4000 transactions in more than a decade, targeting landowners and farmers primarily in the Czech Republic. The website is professionally designed, with clear navigation and relevant content focused on their services, references, and social responsibility initiatives. Technically, the site uses Orchard CMS, jQuery, Bootstrap, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, complemented by a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. Security posture is moderate with no visible security headers and missing WHOIS transparency, which slightly reduces trust. Overall, the site is accessible, informative, and compliant with privacy regulations but could improve in security best practices and domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agro21.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector focused on agricultural land, serving a niche market of farmers and landowners. Their business model emphasizes direct purchase without resale, providing competitive pricing and simplifying transactions. The firm leverages regional representatives for market knowledge and offers valuation services. The presence of numerous positive customer references and social responsibility projects enhances credibility. The company appears small-sized but well-established since 2008. The website supports marketing and client engagement through content, videos, and clear contact channels. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The company maintains active social media presence on Facebook and Twitter, supporting brand visibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy and security compliance. However, no HTTP security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected, and no explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness and transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Klaro for consent is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for security. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and improving domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Verify and improve SSL/TLS configuration to ensure strong encryption and compatibility with modern browsers and security standards.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness for security incidents.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain registration transparency and trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and ensure cookie consent mechanisms are up to date with evolving privacy regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AGRO 21 s.r.o.
Registration number
spis C 29887
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AGRO 21 s.r.o.
Description
Zabýváme se organizací nákupu půdy pro zemědělce. Půdu sháníme pro koncové uživatele, kteří ji od majitelů kupují napřímo, pozemky nepřeprodáváme. Díky této strategii jsme za posledních 10 let realizovali přes 4000 obchodů.
Key services
Organizace nákupu půdy pro zemědělce, Ocenění a prodej zemědělské půdy, Poradenství a obchodní zastoupení
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaro Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Orchard CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No sensitive data exposed in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Klaro Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. No WHOIS data available, which reduces trust in domain registration transparency
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with email, phone, and physical address
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  6. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (Orchard)
  7. Good user experience and navigation with clear business focus
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
  9. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking with cookie consent
  10. No terms of service page detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Orchard CMS, utilizing jQuery and Bootstrap for frontend functionality and layout. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for user tracking and analytics. Klaro is used for cookie consent management, supporting GDPR compliance. The site loads multiple CSS and JS resources asynchronously and defers scripts to optimize performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing resource loading and caching strategies. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and updated accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agro21.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agro21.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.