Skip to main content

Security report for agribalt.lv

Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website agribalt.lv represents a Latvian small business specializing in the sale and servicing of agricultural machinery, including new and used tractors, combines, loaders, and spare parts. The company emphasizes partnerships with leading global brands such as John Deere and New Holland and offers professional consultations and financing assistance. The site is built on WordPress using Astra theme and Kadence blocks, indicating a modern but standard technical infrastructure. HTTPS is properly configured, but the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and explicit contact information, which are areas for improvement. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy business presence with moderate technical and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agribalt.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention agribalt.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for agribalt.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Agribalt.lv targets Latvian farmers and agricultural enterprises, offering a comprehensive range of agricultural machinery and related services. The business model focuses on direct sales, equipment financing, and installation of automatic control systems. The company leverages partnerships with major manufacturers to maintain market credibility. The website content is well-structured and relevant, supporting the business's market positioning as a trusted local supplier. However, the absence of detailed contact information and compliance policies may impact customer trust and regulatory adherence. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a focused sector presence in transportation and manufacturing related to agriculture.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response information, indicates gaps in compliance and security readiness. The site does not appear to use advanced security frameworks or incident response mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, privacy compliance measures, and clear contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and customer support.
  4. Establish an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) to handle security issues promptly.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Company offers new and used agricultural machinery, spare parts, and equipment. They have experience and partnerships with leading global agricultural machinery manufacturers. They provide professional consultations and financing assistance.
Key services
Sale of new and used agricultural machinery, Spare parts supply, Automatic control systems installation and support, Consultations and financing assistance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Kadence Blocks, Elementor, LiteSpeed Cache
Frameworks
Astra WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Astra theme and Kadence blocks.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting agricultural sector.
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. HTTPS is enabled with valid SSL.
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Astra theme and Kadence blocks, with jQuery and Elementor plugins. The site loads multiple optimized CSS and JS files and uses LiteSpeed cache for performance. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and content relevance. However, accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility compliance. The technical stack is modern but standard for small business websites.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agribalt.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agribalt.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.