Skip to main content

Security report for agrautoplus.lv

Autoskola AGR Auto Plus · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AGR Auto Plus is a Latvian driving school established in 2007, providing driver education and professional certification courses across multiple cities in the Vidzeme region. The website clearly targets individuals seeking driver training for various vehicle categories and professional certifications. The business is positioned as a regional leader with over a decade of experience and a solid local presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using a modern tech stack including Bootstrap and popular plugins for SEO, multilingual support, and social sharing. The site is mobile-optimized and includes standard tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA on forms, but lacks some security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent banner and privacy policy in place. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and functional, though WHOIS data is unavailable limiting domain trust verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agrautoplus.lv

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
100
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention agrautoplus.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for agrautoplus.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates a traditional driving school business model focused on education and certification services. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing regional presence and comprehensive course offerings including all major driving categories and professional certifications. Revenue streams likely come from course fees and related services. The target customer segment is local residents in Vidzeme seeking driver licenses and professional driving qualifications. The company maintains active social media channels and uses multilingual support to broaden reach. There is no indication of partnerships or subsidiaries. The business appears stable with consistent branding and positive customer testimonials.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from spam. However, it lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor a vulnerability disclosure mechanism. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. The absence of WHOIS data limits verification of domain legitimacy, which is a minor risk. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small educational website but could be improved to align with best practices and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and providing clearer GDPR-related information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Autoskola AGR Auto Plus
Description
Autoskola “AGR Auto Plus” dibināta 2007. gadā. Nu jau vairāk kā 12 gadus veiksmīgi darbojamies autovadītāju apmācībā septiņās Vidzemes pilsētās: Alojā, Limbažos, Rūjienā, Salacgrīvā, Saulkrastos, Smiltenē un Valmierā. Pie mums var apgūt visas kategorijas – A, B, BE un 95. koda profesionālā sertifikāta apmācības.
Key services
Driver training for categories A, A1, A2, B, BE, AM, Professional certification training (95. Kods), First aid courses (PMP)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, Contact Form 7, WPML (multilingual), Sassy Social Share, Testimonial Free plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap, WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel (via Facebook SDK)
Marketing tools
Sassy Social Share
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple pages.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO, multilingual support, and forms.
  3. Includes cookie consent banner and privacy policy indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and social media links.
  5. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is properly configured.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit; limits domain trust verification.
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  8. Customer testimonials present, enhancing trust.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with a combination of popular plugins such as Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, WPML for multilingual support, and testimonial plugins. The front-end uses Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. Google Analytics and Facebook SDK are integrated for analytics and social media engagement. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. Mobile optimization is good with responsive layouts and viewport meta tags. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. SEO is supported by Yoast and proper meta tags including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small business website with room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agrautoplus.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agrautoplus.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.