Skip to main content

Security report for agorace.cz

Agora CE · Non-profit · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Agora CE is a Czech non-profit organization dedicated to strengthening democratic principles in society. The website presents a professional and well-structured platform showcasing their key services such as Student Agora, participation projects, international projects, study tours, conferences, seminars, and public debates. Their target audience includes students, civic participants, and the general public interested in democratic engagement. The organization maintains a consistent brand presence with active social media channels and a clear call to action for upcoming events. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins including Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7 with Google reCAPTCHA, and WPBakery Page Builder. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and moderate performance. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent management, though some security headers could be improved. The security posture is solid with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with accessible privacy and cookie policies, and a consent mechanism in place. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, slightly impacting the overall credibility score. Overall, Agora CE's website reflects a legitimate, professionally managed non-profit entity with a good digital presence and security awareness. Strategic improvements in security headers and WHOIS transparency would enhance trust and compliance further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agorace.cz

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Agora CE operates as a small-sized non-profit organization in the Czech Republic, focusing on civic education and democratic participation. Their business model revolves around organizing educational events, conferences, and participation projects targeting students and the wider community. The organization leverages partnerships and international projects to expand its reach. Revenue streams likely include grants, donations, and event registrations. The website's clear structure and active social media presence indicate a well-established market position within the non-profit sector. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The organization demonstrates a commitment to transparency and compliance through published privacy and cookie policies.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA on its contact form, reducing risks of spam and interception. Cookie consent is managed via the Complianz GDPR/CCPA plugin, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits the organization's transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider publishing WHOIS information or using a verified domain registration to increase domain trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Agora CE
Description
Agora CE je česká nezisková organizace. Usilujeme o upevňování demokratických principů ve společnosti.
Key services
Student Agora, Participation Projects, International Projects, Study Tours, Conferences and Seminars, Public Debates
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, Google Fonts, Flickity, Magnific Popup, Select2
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent management with Complianz plugin

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar, Complianz GDPR/CCPA Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to a non-profit organization.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  4. Contact form is present but no direct email or phone contact found.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits domain trust verification.
  6. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools indicates active maintenance.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, YouTube, Instagram is evident.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO for search optimization, Contact Form 7 with Google reCAPTCHA for secure form submissions, and WPBakery Page Builder for content layout. External resources include Google Fonts and various JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Flickity, and Magnific Popup. Performance is moderate with some parallax and animation effects. Mobile optimization is good, ensuring usability across devices. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional website experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 39/100High37 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agorace.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agorace.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.