Skip to main content

Security report for agmi.nl

AGMI Traffic & Lighting · Transportation · Netherlands

High risk. 4 critical or high findings in Network security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AGMI Traffic & Lighting is a well-established Dutch company specializing in traffic signage, support structures, and tunnel safety equipment, with a strong focus on sustainability and quality. Founded in 1997, it holds multiple certifications including ISO 9001 and Cradle to Cradle, positioning itself as a leading authority in its sector. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting municipalities and infrastructure sectors. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear cookie consent and privacy policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy and credible with no blocking or WAF interference detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agmi.nl

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
95
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
68
Average
62
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates primarily in the transportation sector, serving B2B clients such as municipalities and infrastructure authorities. Its business model revolves around manufacturing and supplying sustainable traffic and lighting products. The presence of a webshop subdomain indicates direct product sales. The company leverages partnerships, notably with Applepie for web design, and maintains active social media channels to engage its audience. Certifications and sustainability initiatives enhance its competitive advantage and market positioning. The website content and structure support growth and customer engagement effectively.

Security posture

AGMI demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and DNSSEC enabled, reducing risks of interception and DNS spoofing. The site uses consent management for cookies, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The use of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing vulnerability management. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Security headers appear minimal and could be enhanced to improve defense-in-depth. Overall, the security posture is good but can be strengthened with additional policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Maintain transparency on data retention policies and update privacy documentation accordingly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AGMI Traffic & Lighting
Description
AGMI Traffic & Lighting is a leading authority in the Netherlands and beyond specializing in signage, support structures, and tunnel safety equipment. The company emphasizes sustainability, quality, and safety in its products and services.
Key services
Signage (bewegwijzering), Support structures (draagconstructies), Tunnel safety equipment, Sustainable product development (Cradle to Cradle certified processes)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Magnific Popup, jQuery UI
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Consent management for cookies implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Leadinfo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Leadinfo
Marketing tools
Leadinfo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong emphasis on sustainability and certifications.
  3. Clear contact information and social media presence.
  4. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools with consent management.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response contact details.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, and FontAwesome for UI and interactivity, supported by Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed by optimizing scripts and assets. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses DNSSEC and HTTPS, indicating a secure infrastructure foundation. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack by reducing reliance on older libraries like jQuery and improving accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agmi.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agmi.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.