Skip to main content

Security report for agentfly.com

AgentFly Technologies s.r.o. · Transportation · Czech Republic

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AgentFly Technologies s.r.o. is a specialized technology company focused on innovative solutions for air traffic management, unmanned aerial systems integration, tactical military and security operations, and aerial work automation. The company targets aviation professionals, UAS operators, regulators, and defense sectors, positioning itself as a niche B2B provider with notable partnerships including AFRL, FAA, NATO, ONR, CERDEC, and NASA. The website presents a professional image with clear service descriptions and a modern design. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics with IP anonymization and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, ensuring a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience, though some accessibility and SEO enhancements could be made. The absence of a CMS or hosting provider details limits deeper infrastructure insights. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. The missing WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, though the professional web presence and contact information mitigate some risk. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and compliant with basic privacy requirements, but improvements in transparency, security headers, and domain registration verification are recommended to enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agentfly.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AgentFly Technologies operates in a specialized segment of the transportation and technology sectors, focusing on aviation and unmanned systems. Its business model is B2B, providing software and simulation tools to aviation authorities, UAS operators, and military/security clients. The company leverages strategic partnerships with major aerospace and defense organizations to strengthen its market position. Revenue streams likely derive from software licensing, consulting, and research collaborations. The website content and partner logos indicate a credible and established presence, though the lack of public company founding date or registration details limits full business intelligence. The company targets a professional audience requiring advanced technological solutions, indicating a focus on quality and innovation.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and Google Analytics is configured with IP anonymization, reflecting privacy awareness. The use of Cookiebot demonstrates compliance with cookie consent regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response information are published, which limits transparency and preparedness. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, potentially indicating registration or privacy issues. Overall, while basic security practices are in place, enhancements are needed to elevate the security maturity and compliance posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy page linked prominently on the website.
  2. Add and configure essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve web security.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AgentFly Technologies s.r.o.
Description
AgentFly Technologies provides innovative solutions focused on air traffic management modeling and simulation, UAS integration into shared airspace, tactical operations for military and security, and aerial work automation.
Key services
ATM Modeling and Simulation, UAS Integration into Shared Airspace, Tactical Operations - Military & Security, Aerial Work Automation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Cookiebot, WebFont Loader, HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot session tracker
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Professional aviation technology company website with clear service offerings.
  3. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie declaration.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, raising questions about domain registration legitimacy.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided in footer with company email and phone.
  7. Use of Google Analytics with IP anonymization enabled.
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No vulnerability disclosures or security policies published.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern web standards including HTML5 and CSS3, with Google Fonts and asynchronous loading of scripts for performance optimization. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, and Google Analytics is used for traffic analysis with privacy considerations. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident, and no advanced frameworks are detected. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in SEO and accessibility. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and more detailed metadata for SEO.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agentfly.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agentfly.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.