Skip to main content

Security report for agendadulibre.org

Non-profit · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

L'Agenda du Libre is a community-focused platform dedicated to aggregating and promoting events related to free and libre software, arts, data, hardware, and commons. It serves a niche audience interested in open source and libre culture, providing a comprehensive calendar of events, organization listings, and news updates. The website is closely associated with the April organization and related libre initiatives, reinforcing its position within the free software community. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Turbolinks, offering a mobile-responsive and user-friendly experience. However, there is a lack of explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with no visible security headers or incident response information, and WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is functional and relevant for its target audience but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agendadulibre.org

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform operates as a non-profit community service, aggregating events and information for the free/libre software ecosystem. Its business model is based on community engagement and support from related organizations like April. The site targets developers, activists, and users interested in libre software and culture. Its market position is niche but well integrated within the libre community ecosystem. The absence of commercial advertising and tracking indicates a focus on user privacy and community values. Partnerships with known libre organizations strengthen its credibility. Growth indicators include a large number of events and organizations listed, suggesting active community involvement.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a basic security posture. HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed from the HTML content. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options are detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible incident response or security policy information, and no contact channels for security issues are provided. The lack of WHOIS data reduces transparency and trust in domain registration. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the site should improve security headers, provide clear privacy and security policies, and enhance incident response readiness to strengthen its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  5. Improve WHOIS data availability or domain registration transparency to increase legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Software, Arts, Data, Hardware, Contents, Commons, Internet...
Key services
Event calendar for free/libre software and culture, Organization listings, News and updates related to free/libre initiatives
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, FontAwesome, Turbolinks
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a community-driven event calendar focused on free/libre software and culture.
  2. No WHOIS data available to verify domain registration details.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies explicitly found on the homepage.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided in the content.
  5. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in the HTML content.
  6. Website uses modern web technologies and is mobile responsive.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. Strong association with April and related libre initiatives through external links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and uses Turbolinks for navigation speed improvements. It incorporates FontAwesome for icons and is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. The site does not appear to use a common CMS or frameworks like WordPress or Drupal, suggesting a custom or lightweight platform. Performance is moderate with no heavy scripts or trackers detected. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and better semantic markup. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking services, aligning with privacy-conscious design. Technical risks include lack of security headers and missing privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agendadulibre.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agendadulibre.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.