Skip to main content

Security report for agatelazdina.lv

Agate Lazdina · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Agate Lazdina is a small interior design business based in Latvia, showcasing a portfolio of diverse projects including commercial stores, private houses, offices, restaurants, hotels, and branch interiors for notable clients such as MaiMai, LMT, Tele2 Latvia, and others. The website serves as a professional portfolio highlighting project details, collaborators, and photographic credits, targeting potential clients seeking interior design services. The technical infrastructure is built on the Berta.me CMS platform, utilizing standard web technologies like HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Swiper.js for image galleries. The site is mobile responsive and presents a good user experience with clear project categorization, although SEO and accessibility could be improved. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and policies. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating gaps in compliance. Contact information is limited but clearly presented. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site is professional and safe but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching agatelazdina.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the interior design sector with a focus on real estate and hospitality projects. It maintains a niche market position with a portfolio of regional clients, emphasizing quality and collaboration with architects, contractors, and photographers. The business model is service-oriented, providing interior design concepts, 3D visualization, and project realization. The website targets commercial and private clients interested in interior design solutions. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. The company branding is consistent, and trust is supported by detailed project descriptions and client references. Growth indicators or founding year are not disclosed.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage implied by the canonical URL but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. No forms are present to collect sensitive data, reducing attack surface. Absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, minimizing privacy risks. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment. Recommendations include implementing security headers, adding privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response contacts to improve security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance site security.
  3. Introduce secure contact forms with proper validation and CAPTCHA to facilitate client communication securely.
  4. Establish incident response and security contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Improve SEO and accessibility features to enhance user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Agate Lazdina
Description
Interior design portfolio showcasing projects including stores, private houses, offices, restaurants, hotels, and branches for clients such as MaiMai, LMT, Tele2 Latvia, and others. The site highlights interior design projects with detailed descriptions, client names, project years, and collaborators.
Key services
Interior design, Interior concept development, 3D visualization, Project realization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Berta.me CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by og:url
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a portfolio for an interior designer named Agate Lazdina.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. Contact information includes one email and one phone number.
  5. No forms detected on the site.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Site uses Berta.me CMS and Swiper.js for galleries.
  8. No security headers or explicit security policies found.
  9. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
  10. Content is safe and professional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Berta.me CMS platform, leveraging HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Swiper.js for interactive galleries. The site is mobile responsive with a moderate performance profile. Meta tags and Open Graph tags are present but minimal, limiting SEO effectiveness. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. No analytics or tracking tools are used, which is positive for privacy but limits marketing insights. The hosting provider and server details are not disclosed. The site structure is clear but could benefit from enhanced navigation clarity and richer metadata for improved search engine ranking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with agatelazdina.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review agatelazdina.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.