Security report for afriqiyah.aero
شركة الخطوط الجوية الأفريقية · Transportation · Libya
Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.
شركة الخطوط الجوية الأفريقية هي شركة طيران ليبية تأسست في عام 2001 وتقدم خدمات نقل الركاب والبضائع إلى عدة وجهات عربية وإفريقية. تتمتع الشركة بعضويات معترف بها مثل ICAO وIATA، مما يعزز مكانتها في سوق الطيران الإقليمي. الموقع الإلكتروني يعكس هوية الشركة بشكل جيد ويقدم معلومات واضحة عن خدماتها وشبكة رحلاتها. من الناحية التقنية، يستخدم الموقع منصة WordPress مع إطار عمل UIkit ويوفر تجربة مستخدم جيدة مع تصميم متجاوب. من حيث الأمن، الموقع يستخدم HTTPS ولكن يفتقر إلى رؤوس أمان متقدمة وسياسات أمان واضحة مثل security.txt أو سياسة الكشف عن الثغرات. لا توجد سياسات خصوصية أو ملفات تعريف ارتباط واضحة، مما يشير إلى فجوات في الامتثال للخصوصية. بشكل عام، الموقع مهني وموثوق به لكنه يحتاج إلى تحسينات أمنية وخصوصية لتعزيز الثقة والامتثال.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- GDPR outside view
- 10/ 100 · Critical
- Checks completed
- 7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
- (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
- (b) Incident handling: One indicator
- (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
- (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
- (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
- (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
- (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
- (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
- (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
- (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
- Critical
No HTTPS encryption
GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data
What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS
- CWE-319
- OWASP A04:2025
- ASVS V12.2.1
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(a): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(a): Cryptography
- GDPR Art. 32(1)(a)
- NIST SC-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-8: Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
- High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
- GDPR Art. 12
- GDPR Art. 13
- NIST PT-5: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PT-5: Privacy Notice
- High
No Cookie Policy found
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
- High
No Cookie Consent Banner found
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
- GDPR Art. 7
- ePrivacy Art. 5(3)
- NIST PT-4: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 PT-4: Consent
- High
Third-party services without privacy policy
Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn
What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy
- Critical
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
- Critical
No HTTPS Encryption
Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception
What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS
- CWE-319
- OWASP A04:2025
- ASVS V12.2.1
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(a): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(a): Cryptography
- GDPR Art. 32(1)(a)
- NIST SC-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-8: Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
- Critical
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching afriqiyah.aero
This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 0
- Security headers
- 80
- Email security
- 55
- DNS health
- 75
- Network security
- 100
- GDPR outside view
- 10
- Average
- 53
Not counted
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- تنفيذ رؤوس أمان HTTP مثل Content-Security-Policy وStrict-Transport-Security لتعزيز الحماية ضد الهجمات الشائعة.
- إنشاء صفحة سياسة خصوصية واضحة وسياسة ملفات تعريف الارتباط مع آلية موافقة للمستخدمين لضمان الامتثال للمعايير الدولية مثل GDPR.
- إضافة ملف security.txt أو صفحة للإفصاح عن سياسة الكشف عن الثغرات لتشجيع الإبلاغ عن الثغرات الأمنية.
- تحديث نظام إدارة المحتوى والإضافات بانتظام لضمان عدم وجود ثغرات معروفة.
- تعزيز قنوات الاتصال للحوادث الأمنية وتدريب فريق الدعم على الاستجابة السريعة.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- شركة الخطوط الجوية الأفريقية
- Description
- شركة الخطوط الجوية الأفريقية تأسست في أبريل 2001، وتعود ملكيتها إلى الشركة الليبية الأفريقية القابضة للطيران. تقدم خدمات نقل جوي آمنة وفعالة بمعايير دولية، وتدير شبكة رحلات إلى عدة وجهات عربية وإفريقية.
- Key services
- نقل الركاب, نقل البضائع, خدمات على متن الطائرة (درجة اقتصادية ورجال أعمال)
- Content quality
- good
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- WordPress 6.8.1, PHP, JavaScript, UIkit framework, Contact Form 7 plugin
- Frameworks
- UIkit
- Platforms
- WordPress
- Performance
- moderate
- Mobile
- good
- Accessibility
- basic
- SEO
- basic
Security
- Observed score
- 55/100
- Good practices seen
- Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://afriqiyah.aero/)
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Form validation and error handling in JavaScript
Analytics and tracking
- Tracking level
- minimal
- Privacy practices
- poor
Advertising
- Transparency
- poor
Site quality
- Design
- good
- User experience
- good
- Content relevance
- good
- Navigation
- good
- Professionalism
- good
- Trustworthiness
- moderate
Key observations
- Website is fully accessible and content-rich in Arabic language.
- No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on the homepage or linked menus.
- Contact information is clearly provided with multiple phone numbers and emails related to company offices.
- Social media presence includes Facebook and LinkedIn with official company pages.
- The site uses WordPress CMS with UIkit framework and Contact Form 7 plugin.
- No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
- No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
- No cookie consent mechanism or GDPR compliance indicators present.
- The site branding and design are consistent and professional.
- No advertising or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with afriqiyah.aero. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review afriqiyah.aero.