Skip to main content

Security report for affecto.lt

Affecto lietuva · Information technology and services · Lithuania

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

93/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching affecto.lt

This scan found 8 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
90
Email security
87
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
93

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CGI Lithuania holds a strong market position as a major IT and business consulting provider in Lithuania, leveraging the global CGI brand and resources. Their business model focuses on delivering IT outsourcing, system integration, business process services, and consulting to enterprise clients across multiple sectors. The company emphasizes digital transformation, advanced analytics, cybersecurity, and cloud/hybrid IT solutions. The website content and structure indicate a mature organization targeting business clients seeking comprehensive IT solutions. Partnerships with technology providers and use of industry-standard tools reflect a robust ecosystem. Growth indicators include active media presence, career opportunities, and sector-specific offerings. The absence of direct contact emails suggests a controlled communication channel via web forms, typical for enterprise service providers.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML content. Use of service workers and CDN indicates attention to performance and security. However, the lack of explicit security policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents a compliance gap. No security.txt or similar files were found. The cookie consent banner and privacy policy indicate GDPR compliance efforts. The absence of WHOIS data transparency is a concern but may be due to registrar restrictions. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by publishing formal security policies and incident contacts to enhance trust and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security policies and incident response procedures on the website.
  2. Add security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide direct company contact emails and phone numbers for sales and support to improve transparency and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CGI
Description
„CGI Lithuania“ yra viena iš pirmaujančių IT paslaugų teikėjų Lietuvoje, orientuota į sudėtingų, kritinių įmonės sistemų kūrimą, diegimą, konsultavimą, apmokymus ir priežiūrą.
Key services
Verslo konsultavimas, Sistemų integracija, IT užsakomosios paslaugos, Programų paslaugos, Infrastruktūros paslaugos, Verslo procesų paslaugos
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 9, Google Tag Manager, New Relic Browser monitoring, TrustArc consent management, Akamai service worker
Frameworks
Drupal CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML
  • Use of service workers for performance and security

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, New Relic Browser
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic Browser, TrustArc
Marketing tools
TrustArc
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Lithuanian language
  2. Professional IT services company website with clear navigation and structured content
  3. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via web form
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information published
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which is a concern for domain transparency
  7. Use of modern web technologies and performance monitoring tools
  8. Social media presence on major platforms
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with affecto.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review affecto.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.