Skip to main content

Security report for afeefa.de

Afeefa - Digitaler Zusammenhalt e.V. · Non-profit · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Afeefa - Digitaler Zusammenhalt e.V. operates a non-profit digital platform focused on social integration and community engagement in Leipzig, Germany. The website provides multilingual access to information about social services, volunteer opportunities, and local offers for people with diverse backgrounds. The platform positions itself as a local community hub fostering inclusion and participation. Technically, the website uses modern frontend technologies such as Vue.js and MapLibre GL for interactive maps, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the site lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms, which are areas for improvement. Social media presence on Instagram and Facebook supports community outreach. Overall, the security posture is basic with no critical vulnerabilities detected but improvements are recommended to enhance compliance and trust. The domain registration data is consistent and supports the legitimacy of the website. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, cookie consent, and clearer contact information to improve user trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching afeefa.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
28
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a small-sized non-profit entity serving the Leipzig community with a focus on integration and social cohesion. Its business model revolves around providing informational and networking services rather than commercial transactions. The platform targets immigrants, refugees, and local residents seeking social support and community engagement. Partnerships with development entities like 'kolle.dev' and funding organizations are evident from the footer logos. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its multilingual support and comprehensive local offer aggregation. Growth potential exists through expanding service offerings and improving digital presence. The lack of explicit business contact details may limit direct engagement opportunities. Overall, the platform is well-positioned within the non-profit sector in Leipzig but could benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a basic security posture. It uses HTTPS (implied by domain and modern standards, though explicit SSL configuration details are not provided). No security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), or X-Frame-Options were detected in the HTML content. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor contact channels for reporting security issues. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were identified. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policy details beyond a basic privacy page indicates partial GDPR compliance. The site would benefit from implementing security headers, explicit cookie consent, and incident response contact information to improve its security maturity and compliance posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and provide dedicated contact channels for incident reporting (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Include explicit business contact information such as phone numbers and physical addresses to improve trust and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Afeefa - Digitaler Zusammenhalt e.V.
Description
Afeefa provides an overview of places and opportunities in Leipzig for people with and without international backgrounds, including advice, doctors in native languages, leisure activities, and volunteer engagement.
Key services
Information on social offers, Volunteer engagement, Networking for community actors, Multilingual support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, MapLibre GL, Font Awesome 6
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a non-profit community platform focused on integration and social cohesion in Leipzig.
  2. Content is multilingual and targets diverse audiences.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the page.
  4. No visible cookie consent or terms of service pages.
  5. Uses modern frontend technologies like Vue.js and MapLibre GL.
  6. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in the HTML.
  7. Social media presence includes Instagram and Facebook links.
  8. WHOIS data is consistent and domain appears legitimate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website employs a modern frontend stack with Vue.js for reactive UI components and MapLibre GL for interactive mapping features, indicating a good level of technical sophistication. Font Awesome 6 is used for iconography, enhancing visual consistency. The site loads external CSS and JS assets efficiently, though performance is assessed as moderate, possibly due to map rendering and multiple language options. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no structured JSON-LD data found. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Technical debt appears low but the absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms represents a modernization opportunity. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with afeefa.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review afeefa.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.