Skip to main content

Security report for aew.com

AEW · Real Estate · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AEW is a leading global real estate investment management firm with over 40 years of experience managing $82 billion in assets across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. The company serves institutional investors with a broad range of investment strategies including core, core plus, opportunistic, and real estate securities. AEW operates through multiple offices worldwide and is affiliated with Natixis Investment Managers, enhancing its market credibility and global reach. The website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence with clear navigation, rich content, and strong branding. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Font Awesome icons. It supports HTTPS with anonymized IP tracking for privacy and includes a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, providing a good user experience. However, no explicit CMS or hosting provider information was detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks visible security headers and does not publish a security policy or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which is unusual and slightly reduces trust, but the professional site and corporate affiliations mitigate concerns. Overall, AEW's website demonstrates a mature digital presence suitable for its enterprise scale and industry. Strategic improvements in security transparency and WHOIS data verification are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aew.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention aew.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
233
Employees
9
Customers
36
Third parties
188
Weak passwords
11%

Latest record dated 2026-05-22 · 2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for aew.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –fs.aew.com2026-05-22
  • –fs.aew.com2025-08-30
  • –fs.aew.com2025-08-21
  • –fs.aew.com2025-07-22
  • –fs.aew.com2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AEW holds a strong market position as one of the largest real estate investment managers globally, managing a diversified portfolio of assets and serving over 800 clients. Its business model focuses on fiduciary asset management through various investment vehicles tailored to institutional investors. The company benefits from its affiliation with Natixis Investment Managers, providing financial backing and brand strength. AEW's global footprint with offices in key financial centers supports its competitive advantage. The website content and structure indicate a focus on transparency, sustainability, and client engagement. Growth indicators include expanding assets under management and a broad investment platform. The partnership ecosystem includes Natixis and digital agencies like Imarc for web development.

Security posture

AEW's website security posture is solid with mandatory HTTPS encryption and privacy-conscious analytics configurations. The presence of a cookie consent banner aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The lack of WHOIS data transparency is a minor concern but does not directly impact site security. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good, with recommendations to enhance header policies and publish security governance documents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize risk from external dependencies.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure consistency and enhance trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AEW Capital Management, L.P. and AEW Europe SAS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AEW
Description
AEW is one of the largest real estate investment managers globally, managing $82.0/€79.1 billion in assets across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. They provide real estate investment strategies and asset management services to institutional investors.
Key services
Core Strategies, Core Plus & Value-Add Strategies, Opportunistic Strategies, Real Estate Securities Strategies
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Font Awesome, HTML5 Video
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS with anonymized IP in Google Analytics
  • Cookie consent banner with accept/deny options
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on real estate investment management with global presence.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual for a .com domain and warrants further investigation.
  6. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools with anonymized IP for privacy.
  7. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Instagram, and Twitter.
  8. No forms detected on the homepage; contact likely via dedicated contact page.
  9. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts from Google and LinkedIn, Font Awesome for icons, and HTML5 video for rich media content. The site is responsive and accessible, with semantic HTML and ARIA roles for accessibility. Performance appears moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. No CMS or hosting provider details were found, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. The site includes comprehensive meta tags and SEO-friendly structure. Technical debt appears low, but adding security headers and improving WHOIS transparency would reduce risk and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aew.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aew.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.