Skip to main content

Security report for aesa.pl

Autostrada Wielkopolska SA · Transportation · Poland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Autostrada Wielkopolska SA operates as a key toll road operator managing the A2 highway segment in Poland, providing essential infrastructure services and toll collection. The company maintains a professional web presence with multilingual support, targeting drivers and transport companies. Their website offers comprehensive travel information, toll calculators, and customer support channels. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern libraries and includes performance and mobile optimization features. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though security headers and explicit incident response policies could be improved. Overall, the domain registration and business information are consistent and trustworthy, supporting a medium-sized transportation sector entity in Poland.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aesa.pl

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds an important position in Poland's transportation infrastructure sector, operating toll roads that connect Poland with Germany. Their business model centers on toll collection and road management, supported by subsidiaries such as Autostrada Wielkopolska II SA and Autostrada Eksploatacja S.A. The website reflects a focus on customer service and information dissemination, with active social media channels and multilingual content. Revenue streams likely include toll fees and related services. The company demonstrates growth and partnership through its subsidiaries and digital presence, maintaining regulatory compliance with GDPR and providing clear contact information.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent, indicating awareness of privacy and security standards. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests room for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site uses reputable third-party libraries and tracking tools like Google Tag Manager and AcyMailing, which require ongoing monitoring for security updates. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not explicitly provided, which could be a compliance gap. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could benefit from formalized policies and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Autostrada Wielkopolska SA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Autostrada Wielkopolska SA
Description
Lokalizacje punktów poboru opłat na A2 znajdziesz w serwisie internetowym spółek Autostrada Wielkopolska. Trasa to najważniejsze połączenie Polski z Niemcami.
Key services
toll collection, road infrastructure management, travel information, customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.5.5, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, AcyMailing, WPML (multilingual), PWA for WP, Micromodal, Lodash
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
PHP (implied by WordPress), Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • cookie consent implemented
  • no exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
AcyMailing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and maintained.
  2. Content is focused on toll roads and related services in Poland.
  3. Multiple contact channels including phone, email, and online forms are available.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity detected.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and multilingual support.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.5.5, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as Lodash and Micromodal, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. Multilingual support is provided via WPML. The site uses Progressive Web App features and includes responsive design elements for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility. The technical stack is standard for corporate websites, with no critical technical debt observed. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but SSL configuration is excellent. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but could be optimized further for performance and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aesa.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aesa.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.