Skip to main content

Security report for aernnova.com

Aernnova · Transportation · Spain

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aernnova is a leading aerospace company specializing in the design and manufacturing of aero structures such as wings, stabilizers, and fuselages using metal and composite materials. The company targets aerospace OEMs and partners, positioning itself as a key player in the aerospace manufacturing sector. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear business focus. Technically, the site is built on Webflow with modern web technologies, includes cookie consent mechanisms, and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and privacy compliance, though some security headers and explicit contact/security policies are missing. The WHOIS data is not available, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency but does not detract from the professional presentation of the website. Overall, the site is well-structured, compliant, and trustworthy from a business and technical perspective.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aernnova.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the aerospace manufacturing sector, providing design and production services for aero structures. Its business model is B2B, serving major aerospace OEMs. The website indicates a large enterprise with a global presence, offering a range of products and engineering services. The company leverages partnerships and maintains a professional digital presence. The absence of explicit contact details on the main site may indicate a preference for controlled communication channels or regional contact points. The use of cookie consent and privacy policies aligns with GDPR compliance, reflecting awareness of regulatory requirements. The company appears to have a mature marketing and analytics setup, using Google services and Cookiebot for user consent management.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations. No WAF or security challenge was detected, and no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. However, the site lacks some recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no publicly visible security policy or incident response contact information, which could be improved to increase transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional hardening and clearer communication of security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve web security.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security inquiries.
  4. Create and publish a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal terms.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aernnova
Description
Aernnova is a leading company in the design and manufacturing of aero structures, including wings, stabilizers, and fuselages in both metal and composites for top OEMs.
Key services
Design of aero structures, Manufacturing of wings, Manufacturing of stabilizers, Manufacturing of fuselages, Engineering services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Finsweet Attributes
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional aerospace manufacturing company website with clear business focus.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms are implemented.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content provided.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered in the raw WHOIS output.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and hosting on Webflow.
  9. Good SEO and metadata implementation.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Cookiebot for cookie consent, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is hosted on Webflow's infrastructure, which provides reliable performance and scalability. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with good SEO metadata and structured content. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement in loading speed and accessibility compliance. No CMS other than Webflow is detected. The site uses external CDNs for fonts and scripts, which is standard practice. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aernnova.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aernnova.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.