Skip to main content

Security report for aerie.lv

SIA AERIE · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA AERIE is a small, privately held logistics and freight forwarding company founded in 1994, specializing in the handling and transport of dangerous goods across Latvia, Lithuania, and Russia. The company operates terminals and warehouse facilities and offers services including freight forwarding, chemicals trans-shipment, containerization, and quality control laboratory services. The website content reflects a business-to-business model targeting companies requiring specialized transport and logistics services for hazardous materials. The site is basic in design and functionality, with minimal modern web features and no visible contact or compliance information. Technically, the website is built using simple HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS. It lacks mobile optimization, accessibility features, and SEO best practices. No analytics or tracking technologies are detected, indicating minimal digital marketing or user tracking. The absence of HTTPS and security headers represents a significant security weakness, exposing users to potential risks. The site also lacks privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. From a security perspective, the site shows limited maturity. The password form uses client-side JavaScript redirection without validation, and no server-side protections or security headers are evident. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, preventing verification of domain registration details. This limits the ability to fully assess legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site presents moderate risk due to missing security controls and compliance documentation. Strategically, the company should prioritize implementing HTTPS, adding security headers, and publishing privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust. Enhancing contact information visibility and modernizing the website for mobile and accessibility will also strengthen business credibility and customer engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aerie.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SIA AERIE operates in the transportation sector with a niche focus on dangerous goods logistics. Its market position is that of a regional specialist with over 15 years of operational history and partnerships spanning more than 70 countries. The business model centers on B2B freight forwarding and logistics services, leveraging subsidiary and partner networks in Latvia, Lithuania, and Russia. Revenue streams likely derive from freight handling, storage, and quality control services. The company’s partnership ecosystem includes freight forwarders, shipbrokers, sea agents, and container lessors, enabling broad service coverage. Growth indicators include facility expansions noted in 2009. However, the website’s minimal digital presence and lack of modern marketing tools suggest limited online customer acquisition focus. Strategic observations highlight the need for digital modernization and enhanced transparency to support competitive positioning.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak. The absence of HTTPS indicates unencrypted communication, exposing users to interception risks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are present, increasing vulnerability to common web attacks. The password input form relies solely on client-side JavaScript for navigation without validation or protection against injection or CSRF attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and security policy information are absent, suggesting limited preparedness for security events. The lack of WHOIS data further complicates trust verification. Overall, the site demonstrates low security maturity with critical gaps that could impact business operations and customer trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  4. Enhance form security by adding server-side validation and protection against injection and CSRF.
  5. Improve website accessibility and mobile responsiveness to broaden user reach and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA AERIE
Description
Founded in 1994, SIA AERIE is a privately held company providing freight forwarding, chemicals trans-shipment and logistics services in Latvia, Lithuania, and Russia. They operate terminals and warehouse facilities handling bulk and dangerous goods, servicing tank-containers, railtank cars, trucks, trailers, and sea tankers. The company emphasizes quality control with laboratory services and maintains partnerships with regional and international freight forwarders and related logistics entities.
Key services
freight forwarding, chemicals trans-shipment, logistics services, bulk handling and storage, containerization, quality control laboratory services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Basic form input with JavaScript navigation

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on site.
  4. Contact information such as emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses are not present.
  5. Site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with minimal modern web practices.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No social media links or company contact emails found.
  8. Site navigation is simple but lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features.
  9. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS enforcement and security headers.
  10. Business appears to be a small regional logistics company specializing in dangerous goods transport.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is constructed using basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without any detected CMS or modern frameworks. The code uses ISO-8859-1 charset, which is outdated compared to UTF-8. The site lacks responsive design and accessibility features, limiting usability on mobile devices and for users with disabilities. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal digital marketing integration. The hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content. Performance is likely moderate given the simple structure but could be improved with modern optimization techniques. The absence of HTTPS and security headers represents a significant technical risk. Modernization opportunities include adopting a CMS, implementing responsive design, and integrating security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aerie.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aerie.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.