Skip to main content

Security report for advisio.pl

Advisio marketing s.r.o. · Retail · Poland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Advisio marketing s.r.o. is a well-established digital marketing agency operating since 2006, specializing in creating and managing online marketing strategies primarily for e-commerce clients across Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary. The company positions itself as a top-tier agency with a strong regional presence, offering comprehensive services from strategy design to campaign execution and performance analysis. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, supported by multiple industry certifications such as Premier Google Partner and Meta Business Partner. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages modern marketing and analytics technologies including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Google reCAPTCHA v3. The site is mobile-optimized, well-structured, and includes a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, indicating a mature digital infrastructure and compliance with privacy regulations like GDPR. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No critical vulnerabilities were detected in the content or scripts. The absence of WHOIS data due to registry privacy protection slightly reduces transparency but is common for businesses of this type. Overall, Advisio presents a low-risk profile with strong business credibility and good security hygiene. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and maintaining up-to-date software to further strengthen their security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching advisio.pl

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
75
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Advisio operates in the digital marketing sector with a focus on e-commerce clients, servicing multiple Central European markets. Their competitive advantage lies in their comprehensive approach to marketing, combining creativity with data-driven strategies. The company has grown steadily since 2006 and maintains a medium-sized team. Revenue streams likely include consulting, campaign management, and training services. The presence of multiple certifications and partnerships indicates a robust ecosystem and strong industry relationships. Their multilingual websites and localized offices demonstrate a strategic approach to market penetration and client servicing.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforcement and use of Google reCAPTCHA for form protection. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could be exploited in certain attack scenarios. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements, but no dedicated security policy or incident response information is published, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be improved with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Maintain regular updates of WordPress core, themes, and plugins to reduce risk of exploitation through known vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Continue monitoring and auditing privacy compliance, especially with evolving GDPR and related regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Advisio marketing s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Advisio marketing s.r.o.
Description
Tworzymy strategie online w oparciu o kreatywność i dane. Już od roku 2006. Dla lokalnych firm oraz uznanych marek.
Key services
Marketing strategy design, Online campaign creation, Campaign optimization and analysis, Regular reporting
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Contact Form 7, slick carousel
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads, Bing Ads, Sklik
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Bidding Fox, Mergado
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or registry restrictions.
  3. Strong presence in Central European markets with multi-language support.
  4. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms implemented.
  5. Multiple certifications and partner badges enhance trustworthiness.
  6. Use of modern marketing and analytics technologies.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels.
  8. No visible security policy or incident response information published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Google reCAPTCHA v3. It uses slick carousel for UI elements and Contact Form 7 for form management. The site is mobile-optimized and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. The absence of explicit hosting provider information limits full infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional digital marketing presence but could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with advisio.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review advisio.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.