Skip to main content

Security report for adventisti.lv

Septītās dienas Adventistu Latvijas draudžu Savienība · Non-profit · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents the Latvian Seventh-day Adventist Church, a non-profit religious organization providing community services, educational resources, and media content primarily in Latvian. It serves a local and international audience interested in the church's activities, religious teachings, and community events. The site features news, audio, video, photo galleries, and links to partner organizations such as ADRA and Patmos publishing. Technically, the site uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, and cookie consent scripts. The design is responsive and user-friendly with clear navigation and regularly updated content. However, there is a lack of explicit privacy and terms of service pages, and no visible security headers in the HTML source, which are areas for improvement. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating some privacy compliance efforts. Contact information is clearly provided, including email, phone, and physical address, along with social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional for its non-profit religious purpose but would benefit from enhanced security practices and formal privacy documentation to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adventisti.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a small-sized non-profit religious entity focused on community engagement and education within Latvia. Its market position is stable within the religious sector, leveraging partnerships with international bodies like ADRA and publishing houses such as Patmos. Revenue streams likely include donations and sales of religious materials. The target audience is Latvian-speaking church members and interested individuals. The website supports growth through media content and event promotion, maintaining a consistent brand and active social media channels. Strategic observations include the need for improved privacy and security policies to align with modern compliance standards.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate. HTTPS is used, but no HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) are detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The cookie consent banner indicates awareness of privacy regulations, but the absence of a privacy policy and incident response contacts suggests gaps in compliance and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The site should enhance security headers, formalize privacy and incident response policies, and regularly audit third-party scripts to strengthen its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Add and configure HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Conduct a security audit of third-party scripts and ensure all dependencies are up to date and free from vulnerabilities.
  4. Establish an incident response policy and provide clear contact channels for security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Septītās dienas Adventistu Latvijas draudžu Savienība
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Septītās dienas Adventistu Latvijas draudžu Savienība
Description
Latvian Seventh-day Adventist Church providing religious services, community events, educational resources, and media content including audio, video, and publications.
Key services
Religious services and community events, Educational resources (Bible studies, Sabbath school materials), Media content (audio, video, photo galleries), Charitable activities (ADRA partnership)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, jQuery Fancybox, CookieConsent
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external scripts loaded via https)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  4. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Contact information including email, phone, and address clearly displayed.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  8. No security headers detected in HTML source.
  9. No signs of adult or inappropriate content.
  10. Good content quality and navigation structure.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard modern web stack with jQuery and Bootstrap for UI components and responsiveness. Google Analytics is integrated for traffic analysis, and a cookie consent script is implemented for GDPR compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and content relevance. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident from the source. Performance appears moderate with no obvious blocking scripts. The lack of security headers and formal privacy documentation indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Opportunities exist to modernize security practices and improve accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adventisti.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adventisti.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.