Skip to main content

Security report for adr8.us

GPGCO LOGISTICS SERVICES LLC · Transportation · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ADR8.US is a US-based company specializing in the sale and lease of high-quality new and used shipping containers, along with maintenance and logistics/customs services. The company targets businesses and individuals in the USA requiring storage and transportation container solutions. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content, supported by structured data and SEO optimization. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern tracking and marketing tools integrated, including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, enhancing trustworthiness. No critical security or compliance issues were detected, making the site reliable for its intended audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adr8.us

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector focusing on shipping containers, offering a business model combining direct sales, leasing, maintenance, and logistics support. The market positioning is niche but well-defined, serving US customers with flexible container options and intermodal solutions. The presence of a Google Sheets inventory link suggests a transparent and accessible product catalog. The business is relatively new (established 2023) but presents itself professionally online. The use of multiple advertising and tracking platforms indicates an active marketing strategy to capture and convert leads. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent operation. The company maintains clear contact channels and legal information, supporting credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed user preferences, supporting GDPR compliance. However, no explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which could be a gap for security-conscious users. The site uses several third-party tracking scripts, which should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. No vulnerable libraries or security flaws were detected in the provided content. Security headers appear to be missing or not detected, which is a recommended improvement. Overall, the site is secure for typical business use but could enhance transparency and technical defenses.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and incident response procedures to increase user trust and compliance.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party tracking and marketing scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GPGCO LOGISTICS SERVICES LLC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GPGCO LOGISTICS SERVICES LLC
Description
ADR8.US specializes in providing high-quality new and used shipping containers for sale in the USA. They offer a wide selection, competitive prices, and reliable service for storage and transportation needs.
Key services
Buy containers, Lease containers, Maintenance, Logistics & Customs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Bing Ads, Cookie Law Info Plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found
  • Secure forms with input validation patterns

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM likely), Bing Ads, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Cookie consent banner and detailed preferences implemented
  3. Multiple tracking and advertising pixels present
  4. Contact information clearly displayed in header and footer
  5. WHOIS data matches business claims
  6. No terms of service page found
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response info found
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. Website built on WordPress with Yoast SEO plugin
  10. Good SEO metadata and structured data present
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin, leveraging modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Bing Ads, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. Hosting is inferred to be via GoDaddy based on WHOIS and nameservers. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. The site uses a cookie consent plugin that provides granular user control. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional online presence with room for security header enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adr8.us. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adr8.us.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.