Skip to main content

Security report for admiraluosta.lv

SIA „Admirāļu Osta” · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Admirāļu Osta is a small-sized real estate company specializing in luxury apartments located in Jurmala, Latvia. The website presents a professional and well-structured platform showcasing 45 unique apartments with detailed descriptions and multimedia content. The business targets real estate buyers and investors, including those interested in residence permits in Latvia. The company provides comprehensive contact information and a detailed privacy policy, indicating a commitment to compliance and customer engagement. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies, including a CMS named GARDENCOURT, and integrates Google Analytics and YouTube for enhanced user experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and secure forms, though some security headers are missing and no cookie consent banner is present, which could be improved for GDPR compliance. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the website content and contact details appear legitimate and consistent with a professional real estate business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching admiraluosta.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the niche luxury real estate market in Latvia, focusing on elite apartments in a prime location. Its business model revolves around property sales and rentals, supplemented by services related to residence permits. The website indicates a clear market positioning with a focus on quality, comfort, and exclusivity. The presence of detailed privacy policies and contact forms suggests a customer-centric approach. The company appears to be small in size with no parent or subsidiary companies mentioned. The partnership with 3DD.lv for website development indicates collaboration with specialized service providers. The business targets both local and international clients, including EU citizens and legal entities, emphasizing compliance with Latvian regulations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and secure input validation on forms. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which is a missed opportunity for transparency and trust. The privacy policy is comprehensive and GDPR compliant, but the absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a compliance risk. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in headers and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR requirements.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
  4. Include incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA „Admirāļu Osta”
Registration number
40103230906
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA „Admirāļu Osta”
Description
Admirāļu Osta is an elite residential complex located in Jurmala, Latvia, offering 45 unique apartments with luxurious views and home comfort. The project emphasizes unique design, quality, safety, comfort, and location. It also provides information about residence permits in Latvia related to property ownership.
Key services
Sale of elite apartments, Apartment rentals, Information and assistance regarding residence permits in Latvia
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Analytics, YouTube iframe API, Fancybox, Plyr video player
Frameworks
GARDENCOURT CMS (meta generator tag)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with validation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content.
  2. Privacy policy is comprehensive and GDPR compliant.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No cookie consent banner found, which is recommended for GDPR compliance.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  6. No security.txt or incident response information found.
  7. Uses modern technologies and external services like Google Analytics and YouTube.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. No terms of service page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the GARDENCOURT CMS platform and uses modern front-end technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It integrates external services such as Google Analytics for tracking and YouTube iframe API for video content. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility features, though these could be enhanced further. Performance is moderate with video content and multiple scripts, but no major issues detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph tags for social sharing. The site lacks some advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are recommended for compliance and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with admiraluosta.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review admiraluosta.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.