Skip to main content

Security report for admind.dk

Admind ApS · Retail · Denmark

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Admind ApS operates a professional website offering software solutions primarily targeting the care, retail, and office sectors. Established since 2005, the company provides online booking systems, point of sale systems, and accounting software, positioning itself as a specialized B2B service provider in Denmark. The website reflects a consistent brand identity and good content quality, catering to business clients seeking administrative software solutions. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with the Divi theme and incorporates modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and reCAPTCHA, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security or privacy policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer contact information to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching admind.dk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention admind.dk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
23
Employees
0
Customers
23
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
52%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for admind.dk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets business customers in care, retail, and office segments, offering integrated software solutions that streamline administrative tasks. Its market position is supported by a long-standing domain and active social media presence, suggesting stable operations. The business model focuses on software sales and service provision, likely generating revenue through licenses or subscriptions. The use of multiple marketing and tracking tools indicates an emphasis on customer acquisition and engagement. However, the absence of explicit contact details and legal policies may limit customer confidence and compliance with data protection regulations. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms but no identified critical third-party business partners. Growth potential exists through improved transparency and security practices.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the lack of DNSSEC, security headers (such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options), and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The presence of multiple third-party scripts necessitates ongoing vigilance to prevent supply chain risks. Compliance with GDPR is partially addressed through cookie consent but lacks comprehensive privacy documentation. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the site content.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incident reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Admind ApS
Description
Vi tilbyder et bredt udvalg af produkter inden for care, retail og office-segmenterne. Dette inkluderer online booking systemer, kassesystemer og regnskabsprogrammer. Læs mere om vores produkter og hvordan de kan hjælpe din virksomhed.
Key services
Online booking systems, Point of sale (POS) systems, Accounting software
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, reCAPTCHA, Cookie Law Info plugin, Loading Page plugin, Supreme Modules for Divi, Buttonizer plugin, Popups for Divi
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Divi Builder
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Albacross
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Albacross
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Divi theme and multiple plugins for enhanced UX and marketing
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and active
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and YouTube is linked
  6. Use of multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. WHOIS data shows domain is active, not privacy protected, and consistent with business claims
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme, supported by a suite of plugins for enhanced user experience, marketing, and analytics. The tech stack includes jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and reCAPTCHA, reflecting a modern and integrated digital infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD schema. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and some legal compliance pages, which are technical debts that should be addressed. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical implementation supports business goals but has room for security and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with admind.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review admind.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.