Skip to main content

Security report for adjuno.com

EV Cargo · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EV Cargo operates as a global supply chain services provider, offering integrated logistics, freight forwarding, and supply chain management solutions. The website presents a professional appearance with a focus on business-to-business services in the transportation and logistics sector. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies such as Font Awesome 6 Pro icons, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, and LinkedIn Insight for analytics and marketing purposes. Mobile optimization and SEO appear to be adequately addressed, although accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the website lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about the legitimacy and registration status of the domain, which significantly impacts the overall trustworthiness assessment. No contact information or forms were detected, limiting the ability to verify business credibility fully. Overall, the website demonstrates moderate digital maturity but requires improvements in security posture, privacy compliance, and transparency to enhance trust and compliance. The lack of WHOIS data is a critical concern that should be addressed to improve legitimacy and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching adjuno.com

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EV Cargo positions itself as an enterprise-level logistics and supply chain services provider targeting global businesses requiring freight and distribution solutions. The business model is B2B, focusing on integrated supply chain management. The website content and technology stack suggest a mature organization with investments in analytics and marketing tools. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and absence of explicit contact details or compliance policies may hinder trust from potential clients and partners. The company appears to leverage partnerships with major analytics providers but does not expose partner or subsidiary domains in the analyzed content.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is weak due to the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection. There is no evidence of a published privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, which are essential for GDPR compliance and user data protection. The domain's WHOIS data is missing, which is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy and increases risk. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy concerns if not properly managed. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing immediate risk from form-based attacks but also limiting user engagement. Overall, the site requires urgent improvements in security best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is publicly available and accurate to improve legitimacy.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Add explicit and verified company contact information including emails and phone numbers.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Registration number
11814004
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EV Cargo
Description
EV Cargo is a global supply chain services company offering integrated logistics, supply chain management, and freight forwarding solutions.
Key services
Supply Chain Management, Freight Forwarding, Logistics Solutions, Warehousing, Distribution
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Font Awesome 6 Pro, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected
  2. WHOIS data is missing, indicating potential domain registration issues
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found or labeled in the content
  5. Use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts detected
  6. No visible security headers or explicit security policies detected
  7. Website uses modern fonts and iconography (Font Awesome 6 Pro)
  8. Mobile optimization appears good based on viewport meta tag and responsive design indicators
  9. No forms or form fields explicitly detected in the provided HTML snippet
  10. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Font Awesome 6 Pro for icons and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight, and Google Tag Manager. The HTML includes responsive meta tags indicating mobile optimization. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility features. The site lacks visible security headers and explicit SEO meta tags beyond basic viewport and charset declarations. No forms or interactive elements were detected in the analyzed HTML snippet, suggesting limited user input functionality or that such elements are loaded dynamically or on other pages.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with adjuno.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review adjuno.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.