Skip to main content

Security report for addpack.lv

SIA addPack Transport · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA addPack Transport is a small Latvian company specializing in courier and passenger transfer services primarily within Riga, Latvia, and the Baltic region. Their website clearly communicates their business offerings, emphasizing fast delivery and professional service. The company provides direct contact information including phone, email, and a contact form, supporting customer engagement. The website's market position appears local and service-focused, targeting individuals and businesses requiring transport and courier solutions. Technically, the website employs a basic but functional technology stack including jQuery and a slider plugin, with Google Fonts for typography. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and offers a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, the technical implementation lacks modern security headers and advanced performance optimizations. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS (assumed but not explicitly confirmed), but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS. The contact form uses AJAX for submission but does not implement visible anti-spam or CAPTCHA protections. The use of an outdated jQuery version may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy and registrant details. Overall, the website is functional and professional for a small local transport business but requires improvements in security posture and privacy compliance to enhance trustworthiness and regulatory adherence. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, updating JavaScript libraries, adding privacy and cookie policies, and enhancing form security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching addpack.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, focusing on courier and passenger transfer services in Latvia and the Baltic states. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting local customers needing fast and reliable delivery and transport. The website content and contact details suggest a small-sized enterprise with a localized market presence. The lack of visible partnerships or subsidiaries indicates an independent operation. The company leverages direct customer contact and emphasizes professionalism and speed as competitive advantages. Growth potential may be limited by the small scale and regional focus. The absence of privacy and security policies may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic with significant room for improvement. The site lacks critical security headers and uses an outdated JavaScript library, increasing vulnerability risk. No visible incident response or security policy information is provided. The contact form is functional but lacks anti-spam protections. GDPR compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS transparency reduces trust in domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate to low, posing potential risks to business operations and customer data protection.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify certificate validity.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  3. Update JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions.
  4. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  5. Add CAPTCHA or other anti-spam measures to contact forms to prevent abuse.
  6. Monitor WHOIS data and consider transparency to improve domain trustworthiness.
  7. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments.
  8. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features for better user experience.
  9. Consider adding analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to improve business insights.
  10. Establish an incident response plan and publish security contact information.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA addPack Transport
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA addPack Transport
Description
Courier and passenger transfer services with fast delivery times within Riga, Latvia, and Baltic countries.
Key services
Courier delivery, Passenger transfers, Transport services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, bjqs slider, Google Fonts (Open Sans)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed but not confirmed from provided data
  • Contact form uses POST with AJAX submission

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented and consistent.
  4. No social media links lead to active external profiles; all social links are disabled with onclick='return false'.
  5. Website uses older jQuery version (1.12.4) which may have security vulnerabilities.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond jQuery and slider scripts.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security measures.
  8. Website content is professional and relevant to courier and passenger transport services.
  9. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; registrant details unknown.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack primarily based on jQuery 1.12.4 and the bjqs slider plugin, with Google Fonts for typography. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for viewport and content language. The site loads external scripts from trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization techniques detected. Mobile optimization is basic, with some JavaScript detecting mobile user agents. Accessibility features are minimal. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. The site lacks modern security headers and uses an outdated JavaScript library, which could pose security risks. The contact form uses AJAX for submission but lacks visible anti-spam protections. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but dated and could benefit from modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with addpack.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review addpack.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.