Skip to main content

Security report for aconitum.lt

Aconitum · Pharmaceuticals · Lithuania

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aconitum.lt

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail sector focusing on health supplements and herbal products, leveraging direct-to-consumer e-commerce sales. Its competitive advantage lies in manufacturing its own products with GMP certification, ensuring quality and trust. The business model is based on online sales with home delivery, targeting Lithuanian consumers primarily. The presence on social media platforms like Facebook and LinkedIn supports brand engagement and customer outreach. The lack of visible contact details and formal policies may limit customer trust and regulatory compliance. Growth opportunities include expanding transparency, enhancing privacy compliance, and improving accessibility. The marketing ecosystem includes Google Ads and MailerLite, indicating active digital marketing efforts.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements several security headers, indicating a good baseline security posture. The use of Cookiebot for cookie consent shows attention to privacy regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms such as security.txt reduces the overall security maturity. The site could benefit from a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy header and regular third-party script audits to mitigate risks from external dependencies. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service page to improve compliance and customer trust.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security maturity.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Enhance Content-Security-Policy headers to mitigate cross-site scripting risks.
  5. Improve website accessibility features to meet regulatory standards and broaden user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aconitum
Description
Kuriame ir gaminame augalinius vaistus, maisto papildus ir homeopatinius vaistus nuo 1999 metų. Maisto papildai tiesiai iš gamintojo. Pristatymas į namus per 1-2 d.d. Puikūs pasiūlymai ir dovanos. GMP kokybės garantas.
Key services
Manufacture and sale of herbal medicines, Dietary supplements, Homeopathic medicines
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, jQuery, Select2, MailerLite, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics
Frameworks
WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cxense
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Cxense
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
MailerLite, Omnisnippet
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded
  3. Cookie consent implemented with detailed cookie information
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in provided content
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in visible content
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn confirmed
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  8. Good SSL and security header implementation
  9. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aconitum.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aconitum.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

aconitum.lt security report: 74/100, medium risk | Guard