Skip to main content

Security report for acdp.es

ACdP | Asociación Católica de Propagandistas · Non-profit · Spain

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Asociación Católica de Propagandistas (ACdP) is a Spanish non-profit organization dedicated to Catholic propagation and community engagement. The website serves as a digital platform to inform visitors about the association's mission and to facilitate donations. It targets the Spanish-speaking Catholic community and supporters. The organization maintains a moderate-sized online presence with active social media channels and a donation system integrated via GiveWP. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.7.1, leveraging popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating a reasonable level of digital maturity. The site uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking and marketing purposes. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although accessibility features could be improved. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of a publicly accessible privacy policy, terms of service, and security policy pages represents gaps in compliance and transparency. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional front for the ACdP organization, but it would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures to improve compliance and user trust. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and terms policies, adding incident response contacts, and improving accessibility standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching acdp.es

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention acdp.es, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for acdp.es right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ACdP operates as a non-profit religious organization with a clear focus on Catholic propagation in Spain. Its business model revolves around community engagement and fundraising through donations. The website's integration of donation plugins and social media channels supports its outreach and fundraising efforts. The organization appears to have a stable market position within its niche, targeting Spanish-speaking Catholics. The lack of detailed business registration or founding year information limits deeper business intelligence insights. The partnership ecosystem is limited to social media platforms and standard web services, with no identified subsidiaries or parent companies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot, indicating awareness of GDPR and privacy regulations. However, the absence of explicit privacy policies, terms of service, security policies, and incident response contacts reduces transparency and may expose the organization to compliance risks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found, which are recommended best practices. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site uses common and updated WordPress plugins, reducing the risk of outdated software vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be strengthened with improved documentation and disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection, usage, and user rights to enhance GDPR compliance.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  3. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ACdP | Asociación Católica de Propagandistas
Description
Asociación Católica de Propagandistas
Key services
Religious propagation, Community engagement, Donations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.1, Yoast SEO plugin, GiveWP donation plugin, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Ads, Slider Revolution, Cookiebot
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Site Kit by Google
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is restricted by registry policy, limiting domain ownership visibility.
  3. Site uses modern WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO and donations.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  7. Social media presence is established with official Facebook, Twitter (X), YouTube, and Instagram links.
  8. SSL is properly configured and enforced.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  10. Content is safe and appropriate for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform, utilizing well-known plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and GiveWP for donation management. It incorporates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tracking. The site uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management, reflecting GDPR awareness. The technical infrastructure appears stable with no visible errors or broken elements. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, ensuring usability across devices. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The site lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies, which are areas for technical enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with acdp.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review acdp.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.