Skip to main content

Security report for acbr.lv

SIA ACBR · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA ACBR is a well-established Latvian company specializing in the construction, reconstruction, and maintenance of roads, bridges, and other transport infrastructure, alongside building materials production. Founded in 1960 and restructured in 1991, it serves public sector clients such as Latvijas Valsts ceļi and various municipalities. The company is part of the A.C.B. group and holds multiple ISO certifications reflecting its commitment to quality, environmental management, occupational health and safety, and energy management. The website is built on WordPress with multilingual support, featuring a professional design and clear navigation, though mobile optimization is basic. From a technical perspective, the site uses common web technologies including jQuery, Google Analytics, and WPML for language management. While HTTPS is enabled, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which impacts compliance with GDPR and privacy best practices. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy verification, though the website content aligns with a legitimate business profile. Security-wise, the site demonstrates moderate maturity with HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers and visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. No contact emails or phone numbers are explicitly provided on the homepage, limiting direct communication channels. Overall, the website is safe, professional, and business-focused, with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching acbr.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention acbr.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for acbr.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ACBR operates in the transportation infrastructure sector, focusing on road and bridge construction and related services. Its long history and ISO certifications position it as a credible and stable player in the Latvian market. The business model centers on providing construction and manufacturing services primarily to public sector clients and municipalities. The company benefits from a strong employee base and is part of a larger group, indicating potential resource and operational synergies. The website reflects a traditional corporate presence with multilingual support, targeting local and regional stakeholders. Growth indicators include sustained client relationships and adherence to international standards. However, the digital presence lacks comprehensive privacy and security disclosures, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No visible forms or inputs with explicit security measures were detected. The absence of privacy policies and incident response contacts indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. Google Analytics is used for tracking, but no cookie consent mechanism is evident, raising privacy concerns. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general inquiries and security incident reporting.
  4. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response procedures to improve security transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate security risks and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA ACBR
Description
SIA „ACBR” specializes in construction, reconstruction, and repair of roads, streets, squares, bridges, and other transport structures, as well as territory improvement and building materials production. Founded in 1960 as Rēzeknes 9. Ceļu būves rajons, reestablished in 1991 as SIA „ACBR" by company employees. Major clients include VAS Latvijas Valsts ceļi, municipalities, and various companies. The company holds ISO certifications for quality, environment, occupational health and safety, and energy management.
Key services
Road construction, Bridge and transport structure construction, Water supply and sewage systems, Construction project management, Asphalt concrete production, Quarry management, Engineering geodesy and topography, Certified building materials testing, Transport and road construction machinery services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML), Photo Gallery plugin, Modernizr, Conditionizr
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian with multilingual support (English, Russian).
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly presented in the visible content.
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. Security headers are missing or not detected, representing a moderate security risk.
  7. Company holds multiple ISO certifications indicating quality and compliance focus.
  8. Business is a large, established transportation infrastructure company in Latvia.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
  10. No data protection officer or GDPR compliance statements found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with common plugins such as WPML for multilingual support and a photo gallery plugin. It uses jQuery and modernizr libraries for frontend functionality. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site loads multiple CSS and JS resources from its own domain and trusted external sources. Performance is moderate with a fixed width viewport and basic mobile optimization. Accessibility features are minimal but present. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags included. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features, indicating technical debt in security and privacy implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with acbr.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review acbr.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.