Skip to main content

Security report for acautoevakuacija.lv

AC Autoevakuators · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AC Autoevakuators is a small local transportation service provider based in Latvia, specializing in vehicle towing, roadside assistance, and cargo transportation primarily serving Riga and surrounding regions. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and service descriptions. The technical infrastructure is modern, leveraging the Astro framework and hosted on Hostinger, with Google Analytics integrated for user tracking. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or terms of service documentation. Overall, the website is functional, mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching acautoevakuacija.lv

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets vehicle owners and drivers needing towing and roadside assistance services in Latvia. Its business model focuses on service delivery with key offerings including emergency towing, planned vehicle transport, and specialized cargo handling. The website content and structure suggest a focus on local market penetration with moderate digital maturity. The absence of privacy and terms policies indicates room for compliance improvement. The use of Google Analytics shows an intent to monitor user engagement, supporting growth and marketing efforts. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communications, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The contact form collects email and message data but lacks visible advanced security features like CAPTCHA or anti-spam measures. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, HSTS) to improve security posture.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Add incident response contact information and consider a vulnerability disclosure policy.
  4. Enhance contact form security with CAPTCHA or anti-spam mechanisms.
  5. Regularly review third-party scripts and analytics tools for privacy and security compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AC Autoevakuators
Description
Evakuatora pakalpojumi - Rīga, Rīgas rajons, Ozolnieki, Olaine, Jelgava. Plānota vai ārkārtas auto evakuācija un palīdzība uz ceļa, rezervējiet auto transportēšanu iepriekš. Izsauciet evakuatoru par adekvātām cenām!
Key services
Auto towing, Roadside assistance, Cargo transportation, Vehicle recovery, Specialized transport for damaged vehicles, motorcycles, low and sports cars
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Fonts (Roboto), Astro framework, Hostinger Website Builder
Frameworks
Astro
Platforms
Hostinger
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and contact form.
  6. Website uses modern technologies and is hosted on Hostinger.
  7. Security headers are missing or not detected.
  8. No explicit or adult content detected.
  9. Google Analytics is used for tracking.
  10. Website content is in Latvian with some English meta tags.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Astro framework and hosted on Hostinger, indicating a modern and scalable technical foundation. It uses Google Fonts for typography and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected in the HTML content. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The site lacks advanced technical security configurations such as security headers. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs but has opportunities for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with acautoevakuacija.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review acautoevakuacija.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.