Skip to main content

Security report for abppraha.cz

ABP a.s. Praha · Real Estate · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ABP a.s. Praha is a Czech architectural and construction project design company established in 2005. The company offers comprehensive services including project design, documentation, and legislative process support for various building types such as administrative, residential, transportation, and industrial structures. Their market position appears to be that of a small, specialized local firm serving clients requiring detailed project execution documentation and regulatory compliance assistance. Technically, the website is built using outdated technology (Microsoft FrontPage 4.0) with static HTML content, lacking modern web standards, mobile optimization, and accessibility features. There is no evidence of HTTPS or security headers, which negatively impacts the security posture. The site does not provide privacy or cookie policies, nor does it offer contact information or interactive forms, limiting user engagement and trust. Overall, the website reflects a basic online presence with significant room for modernization and security improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching abppraha.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention abppraha.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for abppraha.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate and transportation sectors, focusing on architectural project design and consulting. Their business model revolves around providing end-to-end project documentation and regulatory navigation for construction projects. The absence of contact details and digital marketing tools suggests a traditional client acquisition approach, possibly relying on direct client relationships or offline channels. The domain age and registration data support the legitimacy and stability of the business. However, the lack of certifications, trust indicators, and modern web presence may limit competitive advantage in the digital space. There is no indication of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content.

Security posture

The website exhibits a low security maturity level. There is no HTTPS detected in the provided data, no security headers, and no evidence of secure forms or data handling practices. The use of outdated web technology increases the risk of vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response mechanisms and security contact channels are not provided. These factors collectively represent a significant security and compliance gap that could expose the business to risks and reduce user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Modernize the website technology stack to current standards (e.g., responsive design, modern CMS).
  4. Include clear contact information and security incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Add security headers and conduct regular security audits to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ABP a.s. Praha
Description
Společnost ABP a.s. Praha navrhuje stavby se značkou kvality. Provede investora legislativním procesem od dokumentace pro územní rozhodnutí, přes stavební povolení až k úspěšné kolaudaci. Zajišťuje prováděcí projekty pro náročné klienty. V referencích jsou administrativní objekty, bytové domy, dopravní stavby a mosty, průmyslové stavby a další občanské stavby.
Key services
project design, project documentation, legislative process support, construction permits, project execution documentation
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, Microsoft FrontPage 4.0
Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is static and built with outdated technology (Microsoft FrontPage 4.0).
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links present.
  4. No forms or interactive elements detected.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS information available.
  6. Content is in Czech language and focused on architectural project design.
  7. No tracking or analytics scripts detected.
  8. Website lacks modern SEO and accessibility features.
  9. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with legacy technology (Microsoft FrontPage 4.0) and static HTML, resulting in poor performance, lack of mobile optimization, and limited accessibility. No modern frameworks, CMS, or analytics tools are detected. Hosting is provided by WEDOS, a known Czech hosting provider. The site lacks SEO optimization and meta tags beyond basic keywords. There are no interactive elements or forms, indicating minimal technical complexity but also limited user engagement capabilities. The technical debt and outdated infrastructure pose risks for maintainability and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with abppraha.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review abppraha.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.