Skip to main content

Security report for abgpersson.lv

SIA AB.G.PERSSON · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA AB.G.PERSSON is a Latvian freight transportation company specializing in road freight services across Scandinavia, the Baltics, and Latvia. With over 20 years of experience and a fleet exceeding 50 trucks, the company offers a range of services including full and combined load cargo, door-to-door transportation, and international logistics. The website reflects a professional and established business with clear service offerings and contact information, targeting businesses requiring freight transport in the region. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Themify framework and Yoast SEO plugin, integrating Google Maps for location display. The site is mobile-optimized with moderate performance and good SEO practices. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced, but there is a lack of security headers and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating gaps in compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and security best practices. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust analysis, but the website content and business information appear consistent and legitimate. Strategic recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, and publishing incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching abgpersson.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a solid regional market position in freight transportation with a medium-sized fleet and over two decades of operational history. Its business model focuses on logistics and transportation services across multiple Northern European countries, targeting commercial clients. The website's content and structure support lead generation through quote requests and contact forms. The presence of an honorary tax payer title adds credibility. However, the lack of detailed corporate information such as founding year or parent company limits deeper business intelligence. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated on the site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security maturity with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a security.txt file or incident response contact information indicate gaps in security best practices. No evidence of GDPR compliance mechanisms like privacy or cookie policies was found, which may pose compliance risks. The site does not appear to use extensive tracking or analytics, reducing privacy concerns but also limiting user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved with standard security and compliance enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and inform users about data handling.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security transparency.
  4. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any potential vulnerabilities or outdated libraries.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and performance optimization to improve user experience and SEO.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA AB.G.PERSSON
Registration number
LV 44103008329
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA AB.G.PERSSON
Description
We ensures fast and reliable freight transport by road in the Baltics and Scandinavia. With 20+ years of experience we take the best care of your order.
Key services
Transportation to/from Sweden & Norway, Transportation in Sweden, Norway & Baltics, Freight in Latvia, Combined load, Full load cargo, Door-to-door transportation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Themify Builder, jQuery, Google Maps API
Frameworks
Themify
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with company email and physical address.
  5. Site uses HTTPS and modern WordPress-based tech stack.
  6. No security.txt or incident response info found.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond standard WordPress and Yoast SEO.
  8. Content is professional and relevant to freight transportation business.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Themify Builder framework and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and widely supported technology stack. It uses jQuery and Google Maps API for interactive features. The site is mobile responsive and includes SEO meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine visibility. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. However, no advanced analytics or tracking tools were detected, and security headers are missing. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from improved security configurations and enhanced privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with abgpersson.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review abgpersson.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.