Skip to main content

Security report for abelzieduterases.lv

Kaamos SIA · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

37/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website abelzieduterases.lv represents a residential real estate development project named 'Ābeļziedu terases' located in Riga, Latvia. Developed by Kaamos SIA, a family-owned Estonian company with over 20 years of experience, the project focuses on energy-efficient apartments with modern amenities. The site targets home buyers and families interested in sustainable living in an urban environment. The business model centers on real estate development and sales, with a strong emphasis on quality and energy efficiency. The website content is professionally presented, multilingual, and includes detailed project descriptions, image galleries, and contact options.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching abelzieduterases.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
37

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kaamos SIA positions itself as a stable and trustworthy real estate developer with a Scandinavian design influence and a commitment to quality. The company operates in the real estate and energy sectors, leveraging its 20 years of experience. The website links to related corporate domains kaamos.ee and kaamos.lv, indicating a regional presence. The business model is direct sales of apartments with a focus on energy efficiency and customer satisfaction. The presence of detailed privacy policies and consent mechanisms reflects compliance with GDPR and a customer-centric approach. The company maintains active social media profiles to engage with potential clients.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and integrates Google reCAPTCHA on its contact forms to mitigate spam and abuse. It uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing, with cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the site lacks explicit HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance security posture. No dedicated security policy or incident response information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional headers and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen site security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kaamos SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kaamos SIA
Description
Residential real estate development project 'Ābeļziedu terases' offering energy-efficient apartments in the Teika district of Riga, Latvia, developed by Kaamos, a family-owned Estonian company with 20 years of experience in construction and real estate.
Key services
Apartment sales, Real estate development, Energy-efficient building construction
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Google reCAPTCHA, MovingBoxes slider plugin, Hummingbird performance plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed WordPress site for a Latvian real estate project.
  2. Content is in Latvian with language switch options for English and Russian.
  3. Includes multiple image sliders showcasing apartments and project visuals.
  4. Contact form uses Contact Form 7 with reCAPTCHA and consent checkboxes.
  5. Privacy policy is comprehensive and GDPR compliant, hosted on related Kaamos domain.
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML source.
  7. Uses Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing.
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; no DNSSEC info found.
  9. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using PHP and jQuery, with Bootstrap framework for responsive design. It incorporates several plugins including Contact Form 7, MovingBoxes slider, and Hummingbird for performance optimization. Analytics and marketing tools include Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, integrated with cookie consent scripts. The site loads multimedia content such as videos and image sliders efficiently, though performance is moderate. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for the business needs, with opportunities for improvement in security headers and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with abelzieduterases.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review abelzieduterases.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.