Skip to main content

Security report for abcpolise.lv

Eurorisk · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ABCpolise.lv is an online insurance brokerage platform specializing in OCTA (compulsory motor third-party liability) insurance in Latvia. The website offers a fast and convenient OCTA policy purchase experience, including a price comparison calculator featuring offers from nine major insurance companies. The business is operated by Eurorisk, a well-established insurance broker in Latvia, providing customer support and additional services such as SMS reminders for policy expiry. The platform targets Latvian vehicle owners seeking mandatory insurance coverage with competitive pricing and ease of purchase. Technically, the website employs common web technologies including jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use, with basic accessibility features. SEO practices are adequately implemented with proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, explicit security headers are missing, and no public security or incident response policies are found, indicating room for improvement in security posture. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain trust analysis, but the presence of consistent business information and external references supports legitimacy. Overall, the site maintains a moderate security posture but would benefit from enhanced security headers and transparency. The overall risk assessment is moderate with a recommendation to strengthen security headers, improve mobile optimization, and publish clear security policies. The business model and market position are solid within the Latvian insurance brokerage sector, supported by a reputable parent company. Continued focus on compliance and security best practices will enhance trust and operational resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching abcpolise.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention abcpolise.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for abcpolise.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ABCpolise.lv operates as an important player in the Latvian insurance brokerage market, focusing on compulsory vehicle insurance (OCTA). Its competitive advantage lies in aggregating quotes from nine insurers, enabling customers to compare prices and purchase policies online quickly. The business model is commission-based brokerage with value-added services like SMS reminders and customer support. The partnership with Eurorisk, a leading insurance broker, strengthens its market credibility and operational capacity. The target customers are vehicle owners in Latvia, a regulated market requiring mandatory insurance. The website's integration with multiple insurer brands and affiliate programs indicates a mature partnership ecosystem. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital marketing and expanded insurance product offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, and cookie consent is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No public security or incident response policies are available, limiting transparency and preparedness. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager introduces potential risk vectors that require regular auditing. Data collection is limited to necessary vehicle and license information with required fields, but no advanced input validation details are visible. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and protection standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish clear security and incident response policies to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience across devices.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  5. Increase visibility of data protection officer or privacy contact to strengthen GDPR compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eurorisk
Description
Ātrais OCTA serviss - izgatavosim polisi 15 minūtēs. OCTA kalkulators- OCTA cenu salīdzināšana, cenas no 9 apdrošinātājiem.
Key services
OCTA insurance policy sales, OCTA price comparison from 9 insurers, Customer support and consultation, SMS reminders for policy expiry
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google Plus API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical link with http but likely https available)
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. No WAF or security blocking detected.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust analysis.
  4. Business is an insurance broker with clear contact info and multiple insurer partnerships.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policy are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking.
  7. No explicit security headers found in HTML source; potential area for improvement.
  8. Forms collect vehicle registration and license numbers with required fields.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, Draugiem.lv, and Google Plus (legacy).
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The HTML structure is valid with proper meta tags supporting SEO. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. No modern CMS or frameworks are explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or legacy platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses canonical links and social media integration for branding. Technical debt is moderate due to missing security headers and limited accessibility features. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and enhance security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with abcpolise.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review abcpolise.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.