Skip to main content

Security report for abasto.cz

Abasto s.r.o. · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Abasto s.r.o. is a Czech Republic-based medium-sized wholesale distributor specializing in fruits, vegetables, herbs, mushrooms, and other food products. The company targets HoReCa businesses, retail chains, catering services, manufacturing companies, and corporate canteens, positioning itself as a reliable supplier with a broad product range and certified quality standards. The website reflects a professional business presence with clear service offerings, customer references, and contact channels. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with structured data and meta tags. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though explicit security headers are missing. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable concern for domain legitimacy, but the overall business credibility remains high based on content and certifications. Strategic recommendations include improving security headers, adding incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, and verifying domain registration details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching abasto.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Abasto operates in the wholesale food supply sector with a focus on fresh produce and specialty food items. Its competitive advantages include direct sourcing from suppliers and growers, daily delivery logistics across Czech Republic, and certifications such as FSSC 22000 and HACCP that enhance trust. The business model relies on B2B sales to hospitality and retail sectors. The company is part of the Hortim Group, indicating a broader partnership ecosystem. The website content and references suggest a stable market position with a medium-sized operational scale. Growth indicators include a comprehensive product range and personalized customer service with dedicated sales representatives. The company leverages digital marketing tools and social media to maintain customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, cookie consent mechanisms, and secure form validation. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and others reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness communication. GDPR compliance is supported by a detailed privacy policy and cookie management. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and formalizing security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly update third-party libraries and WordPress core to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Abasto s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Abasto s.r.o.
Description
Váš velkoobchod ovoce, zeleniny, bylinek, hub a dalších potravin pro Prahu a celé Čechy. Jsme ideálním partnerem pro HoReCa.
Key services
Wholesale supply of fresh produce and food, Call center support daily 6:00-21:00, Product processing on request, Daily deliveries across Czech Republic, Certified quality and freshness
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.2.1, Bootstrap CSS, Slick Carousel, Lightbox, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Facebook SDK
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with express consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces trust score.
  3. Strong presence of certifications and trust signals.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented properly.
  5. No explicit security headers detected in HTML source.
  6. Use of common third-party libraries and WordPress CMS.
  7. Contact information is clear and includes multiple channels.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook confirmed.
  10. No terms of service page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, and Lightbox libraries. It uses Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization and integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook SDK for analytics and marketing. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and Adobe Typekit. Performance is moderate with standard optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO metadata is well implemented including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. No hosting provider information was detected. The site uses a cookie consent banner with express consent, indicating attention to privacy compliance. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential outdated libraries if not regularly maintained.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with abasto.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review abasto.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.