Skip to main content

Security report for aannemingsbedrijfnoord-zuid.nl

Aannemingsbedrijf Noord Zuid B.V. · Real Estate · Netherlands

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aannemingsbedrijf Noord Zuid B.V. is a well-established Dutch construction company specializing in new builds, renovations, remodeling, and maintenance services. With over 35 years of experience, the company targets residential and commercial property owners in the Netherlands, emphasizing reliability and collaboration with trusted suppliers and subcontractors. The website reflects a professional image with clear service offerings and contact information, supporting its market position as a trusted local construction firm. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and WPBakery Page Builder, ensuring good SEO and content management capabilities. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though some accessibility features could be improved. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced, but the absence of key security headers and published security policies indicates room for improvement in hardening the site against threats. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced security headers and incident response documentation. Privacy compliance is supported by a visible cookie consent mechanism and a privacy policy page, though terms of service and vulnerability disclosure policies are missing. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, reinforcing legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and enhancing accessibility and privacy compliance measures to strengthen trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aannemingsbedrijfnoord-zuid.nl

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
73
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the Real Estate sector, focusing on construction services including new construction, renovation, remodeling, and maintenance. Its business model is service-oriented, targeting local Dutch markets with a focus on quality and reliability. The 35+ years of experience and clear contact details provide competitive advantages. The website indicates a small-sized enterprise with no parent or subsidiary companies. Partnerships appear limited to service providers such as the website developer (DataSign). Revenue streams likely derive from contracted construction projects. The company’s digital presence is professional but could expand with social media engagement and more detailed business disclosures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the lack of common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No incident response or security policy is published, which limits transparency and preparedness. The cookie consent banner indicates some privacy awareness, but GDPR compliance could be enhanced with clearer data retention and processing disclosures. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is functional but not comprehensive.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy) to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits of WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience.
  5. Expand privacy compliance documentation with detailed data processing and retention policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Aannemingsbedrijf Noord Zuid B.V.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aannemingsbedrijf Noord Zuid B.V.
Description
Aannemingsbedrijf Noord Zuid is an experienced and dynamic construction company specializing in new construction, renovation, remodeling, and maintenance. The company emphasizes collaboration with reliable suppliers and subcontractors.
Key services
Nieuwbouw (New construction), Verbouw (Remodeling), Renovatie (Renovation), Onderhoud (Maintenance)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, Yoast SEO plugin, WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery, FontAwesome, Burst Statistics plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Burst Statistics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Burst Statistics
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to construction industry
  3. Contact information is prominently displayed and consistent
  4. No terms of service page found
  5. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  7. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools
  8. No suspicious or malicious external links detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and WPBakery Page Builder for content layout. The tech stack includes jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, though some optimization opportunities exist. Mobile responsiveness is good, ensuring usability across devices. The site uses a cookie consent banner for compliance. No advanced hosting or CDN details were found. Technical debt appears low, but security hardening and accessibility improvements are recommended to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aannemingsbedrijfnoord-zuid.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aannemingsbedrijfnoord-zuid.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.