Skip to main content

Security report for aagenosta.lv

AAGENOSTA · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AAGENOSTA is a small, locally focused harbor and boat rental service operating in the center of Riga, Latvia. The company provides guarded mooring spaces for yachts and cutters as well as rental services for various boats including cutters and motor yachts. The website is built on WordPress using a modern theme and includes multilingual support for Latvian, Russian, and English. Contact information and partner links are clearly presented, supporting business credibility. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies and Google Maps integration but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a gap in GDPR compliance. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aagenosta.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets boat owners and maritime enthusiasts in Riga, offering essential harbor services and boat rentals. Its market position is that of a local service provider with a niche focus on the Riga harbor area. The business model is service-oriented, generating revenue from mooring fees and boat rentals. Partnerships with local maritime and hospitality businesses are evident from the linked partner domains. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and moderate trust signals through contact details and social media. Growth potential may be limited by the local market size but supported by tourism and boating activities in Riga.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses some security-related plugins such as Google Captcha, but lacks explicit security headers like Content Security Policy or HSTS. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency in security readiness. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the HTML content. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance risk under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, policies, and incident response details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish an incident response plan or contact channel for security issues to enhance trust.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding analytics with privacy-respecting configurations and disclose data retention policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AAGENOSTA
Description
“AAGENOSTA” is a guarded cutter and motor yacht harbor located in the center of Riga, on the left bank of the Daugava River, in the Āgenskalns bay. The harbor offers 100 mooring places for vessels, available both in summer and winter. It is located at Balasta dambis 1, Riga, and is open to all interested visitors.
Key services
Guarded mooring for yachts and cutters, Boat rental services including cutters and motor yachts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Maps API, Visual Composer, Font Awesome
Frameworks
WordPress theme Rhythm
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URLs)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA plugin (google-captcha)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based harbor and boat rental service in Riga, Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian with language switcher for Russian and English.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  5. No security policy or incident response information found.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond Google Maps and basic plugins.
  8. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  9. Site uses HTTPS and modern frontend libraries.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a popular theme and uses jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Maps API. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and Google services. Performance is moderate with no evident broken elements. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is basic with meta tags and canonical links but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. The site does not use advanced analytics or marketing tools, indicating a simple technical footprint. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aagenosta.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aagenosta.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.