Skip to main content

Security report for a-es.eu

A-ES Logistics · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

A-ES Logistics is a Latvian-based logistics company specializing in local and international freight transportation with over 20 years of experience. The company offers a comprehensive range of services including land, sea, air, and rail cargo transport, customs brokerage, insurance, and warehousing solutions. Their market position is supported by a strong portfolio of services and positive customer reviews, indicating a trusted presence in the transportation sector. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and detailed service descriptions targeting both businesses and private individuals. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking tools, optimized for mobile and SEO. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and secure form handling but lacks advanced security headers and incident response disclosures. Privacy compliance is limited due to missing explicit privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site presents a credible and professional business with room for improvement in security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching a-es.eu

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention a-es.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for a-es.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, focusing on freight logistics across multiple countries, including extensive European coverage. Their business model revolves around providing tailored logistics solutions for various cargo types, including oversized and sensitive goods. Revenue streams likely include transport fees, customs brokerage, and insurance services. The target customers include both corporate clients and private individuals requiring reliable cargo transport. The presence of loyalty programs and partnerships with other businesses like Virši and Wash and Drive indicates a strategic approach to customer retention and service expansion. The company demonstrates growth potential through diversified service offerings and strong customer satisfaction.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses secure contact forms with validation, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Tag Manager is standard but requires regular auditing to prevent vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the content. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to enhance header policies and publish security-related disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident response.
  4. Disclose incident response contact information, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
A-ES Logistics
Registration number
LV 41503023453
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
A-ES Logistics
Description
Kravu pārvadājumi ar 20 gadu pieredzi. Vietējie un starptautiskie kravu pārvadājumi 24/7. Visa veida pilnas un saliktas kravas. Muita, apdrošināšana
Key services
Sauszemes kravu pārvadājumi, Lielgabarīta kravu pārvadājumi, Jūras kravu pārvadājumi, Dzīvnieku pārvadājumi, Dzelzceļa kravu pārvadājumi, Avio kravu pārvadājumi, Muitas brokeris, Kravas apdrošināšana, Noliktavu telpas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Call Now Button plugin, Rank Math SEO plugin, WPBakery Page Builder, WordPress
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics asynchronously
  • Contact form with validation

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO, Call Now Button
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented with detailed service offerings
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in multiple locations
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  6. Google reviews show strong positive customer feedback
  7. No security.txt or incident response info found
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using WPBakery Page Builder and Rank Math SEO plugin, indicating a modern and flexible infrastructure. It uses jQuery and asynchronous loading of Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts for performance optimization. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with caching and minification plugins evident. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional online presence with opportunities for enhanced security and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with a-es.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review a-es.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.